Original Article

Oat beta-glucan ameliorates insulin resistance in mice fed on high-fat and high-fructose diet

Jie Zheng1,2, Nanhui Shen2, Shuanghui Wang2 and Guohua Zhao1*

1College of Food Science, Southwest University, Chongqing, China; 2Department of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

Abstract

Methods: This study sought to evaluate the impact of oat beta-glucan on insulin resistance in mice fed on high-fat and high-fructose diet with fructose (10%, w/v) added in drinking water for 10 weeks.

Results: The results showed that supplementation with oat beta-glucan could significantly reduce the insulin resistance both in low-dose (200 mg/kg−1 body weight) and high-dose (500 mg/kg−1 body weight) groups, but the high-dose group showed a more significant improvement in insulin resistance (P<0.01) compared with model control (MC) group along with significant improvement in hepatic glycogen level, oral glucose, and insulin tolerance. Moreover, hepatic glucokinase activity was markedly enhanced both in low-dose and high-dose groups compared with that of MC group (P<0.05).

Conclusion: These results suggested that supplementation of oat beta-glucan alleviated insulin resistance and the effect was dose dependent.

Keywords: oat beta-glucan; high-fat; high-fructose; insulin resistance; mice

Received: 4 September 2013; Revised: 17 October 2013; Accepted: 8 November 2013; Published: 20 December 2013

Food & Nutrition Research 2013. © 2013 Jie Zheng et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citation: Food & Nutrition Research 2013. 57: 22754 - http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/fnr.v57i0.22754

 

Insulin resistance, a metabolic syndrome, was pronounced in type 2 diabetes patients (1–3). An accumulation of evidence showed that insulin resistance was associated with obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance (4–6), and cardiovascular disease (7). Although several drugs are available, side effects and drug resistance are of great concern. A great number of people are seeking natural products or dietary interventions for an alternative.

Oat, a worldwide cultivated crop, is rich in the soluble dietary fiber beta-glucan which is a nonstarch polysaccharide composed of linear chains of glucose with a beta-(1–3) and beta-(1–4) mixed linkage structure (8). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends daily consumption of 3 g beta-glucan either from oats or barley to prevent cardiovascular diseases (9, 10). Consumption of soluble dietary fibers has been associated with lower postprandial glucose and insulin response (11). It has been shown that a significantly decreased level of fasting blood glucose and a tendency to reduce fasting blood glucose and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic subjects was observed with oat beta-glucan (3 g/day) enriched bread for a 3-week intervention period (12). Some similar studies reported that ingestion of foods naturally high in oat or barley beta-glucan improved glycemic and insulin response in overweight or type 2 diabetes subjects (13–19). Considering the health benefits of beta-glucan, many researchers have incorporated barley or oat beta-glucan into various kinds of commonly consumed food products, including breakfast cereals, milk drinks, bread, beverages, and infant foods (20–25).

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of oat beta-glucan in improving insulin resistance in Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice fed on a high-fat and high-fructose diet with fructose added in drinking water. The relationship between different oat beta-glucan doses and the effect in improving insulin resistance were also evaluated.

Materials and methods

Materials

The content of beta-glucan from oat flour (Yikang Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Hebei, China) was determined by a streamlined enzymic method (26) using the mixed linkage beta-glucan assay kit (Megazyme, Wicklow, Ireland). The results were means of triplicate measurements, which gave values of 82.09%.

Metformin was purchased from Qidu Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., (Shandong, China). Other chemicals were of analytical reagent grade.

Animals and designing

Male ICR 6-week-old mice were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of Daping Hospital (Chongqing, China). They were acclimatized at a controlled temperature of 20–24°C and a relative humidity of 50–70% with a 12 h light–dark cycle for 1 week. The standard diet (Laboratory Animal Center of Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China) and water were supplied ad libitum. The composition of the standard diet is shown in Table 1. All procedures using animals obtained the approval of the Animal Experiment Committee of China, and the experiment was carried out in compliance with the Guidelines for Animal Experimentation of the biological and pharmacological research laboratories.


Table 1.  Composition of standard diet (unit:% of diet)
Component Standard diet
Corn flour 35
Wheat flour 15
Soybean 5
Soybean meal 15
Wheat bran 15
Sesame 6.5
Milk powder 2
Bone powder 2.5
Yeast powder 2
Salt 0.5
Vitamin mixture 0.5
Rapeseed oil 1
Total (%) 100

After 1 week of acclimation, the ICR mice were randomly divided into five dietary groups (n=10 for each group), including normal control group (NC), model control group (MC), positive control group (PC) as well as low-dose and high-dose oat beta-glucan control groups (referred to as low-dose and high-dose groups, respectively). The NC mice were fed with the standard diet and tap water; the other four groups were fed with a high-fat and high-fructose diet along with fructose (10%, w/v) added in drinking water. Meanwhile, the low-dose, high-dose, and PC groups of mice were orally administered with either 200 mg/kg−1 body weight or 500 mg/kg−1 body weight of oat beta-glucan, or 500 mg/kg−1 body weight of metformin per day for 10 weeks. All the mice had free access to food and water throughout the experimental period, and their body weights were recorded weekly. The high-fat and high-fructose diet consisted of 10% lard, 10% fructose, 1% cholesterol, 0.25% pig bile salt, and 78.75% standard diet.

Oral glucose tolerance test

Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted after completion of 6 weeks of the experiment. After a 12 h fasting, the mice were orally gavaged with glucose (2 g/kg−1 body weight), and blood glucose concentrations were measured using blood samples taken from the tail vein at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min after glucose administration with an Accu-Chek Active blood glucose meter (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).

Insulin tolerance test

Insulin tolerance test (ITT) was performed at week 8. After a 4 h fasting, insulin at a dose of 0.6 U/kg−1 body weight (Novo Nordisk Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China) was injected intraperitoneally. Blood samples were taken from the tail vein at 0, 30, 50, 70, and 90 min after insulin injection, and blood glucose concentrations were measured as described above.

Blood and tissue sampling

At the end of the study, animals were fasted for 12 h and blood samples were collected by ocular puncture into centrifuge tubes. Serum was isolated by centrifugation at 3,000 g, 4°C for 10 min. Then, all the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation with the anesthetic effect of ether. The liver and abdominal adipose tissue were excised and weighed.

Serum measurements

Fasting serum glucose and insulin levels were measured at the end of the treatment. The serum glucose concentration was determined by the glucose oxidase method (27) with corresponding diagnostic kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Inst., Nanjing, China) according to the instruction manual. Serum insulin level was measured with an ELISA assay kit (CUSABIO BIOTECH Co., Ltd., Hubei, China) with a micro-plate reader (BIO-RAD, Japan). HOMA-IR (28) expressed as an index of insulin resistance was calculated using the homeostasis model assessment: HOMA-IR=fasting glucose (mmol/L)×fasting insulin (uU/mL)/22.5.

Hepatic glucokinase activity and glycogen level determination

The glucokinase activity was measured using a method of spectrophotometric continuous assay (29). One umol glucose-6-phosphate formed per minute per milligram protein was defined as one unit of glucokinase activity. Liver glycogen content was measured using the anthrone-reagent method (30) with corresponding diagnostic kits (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Inst., Nanjing, China) in accordance with the instruction manual.

Statistical analysis

All data were evaluated by a one-way analysis of variance along with Duncan’s multiple-range test. The data were presented as means±SE. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant, whereas a P-value less than 0.01 was considered very significant.

Results

Effect of oat beta-glucan on body weight and abdominal adipose tissue

As indicated in Table 2, there was no significant difference in the body weight among the groups before treatment. During the 10-week experimental period, a significant increase in body weight of MC group was 15.30±0.50 g (53.2% increase) compared with 11.85±1.25 g (40.8% increase) of NC group (P<0.05). Mice in both the low-dose and high-dose groups showed a gradual increase in body weight which was significantly less than that of MC group mice. The adipose tissue weight was 1.3 times higher in MC group as compared with that of NC group (P<0.05).


Table 2.  Effect of oat beta-glucan on body weight and abdominal adipose tissue weight
Dietary group Initial weight (g) Final weight (g) Weight gain (g) Abdominal adipose tissue weight (g)
NC 29.05±0.42 40.90±0.98 11.85±1.25 1.15±0.13
MC 28.75±0.25 44.05±0.35 # 15.30±0.50# 1.51±0.07#
PC 28.45±0.32 41.60±0.81 13.15±0.72 1.37±0.07
Low-dose 29.00±0.33 41.10±0.84* 12.10±0.78* 1.31±0.07
High-dose 28.11±0.99 39.80±1.14** 11.69±1.14* 1.25±0.08
NC=normal control; MC=model control; PC=positive control; Low-dose=low-dose control (200 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); High-dose=high-dose control (500 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan). Values are means ± SE (n=10). #P<0.05 compared with NC; *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with MC.

Serum glucose, insulin, and insulin resistance index

Fasting serum glucose and insulin levels were 1.3 and 1.2 times higher in MC group than in NC group, respectively. Supplementation of high-dose beta-glucan significantly reduced serum glucose and insulin levels by 15.9 and 14.9% compared with MC group (P<0.05). As presented in Table 3, insulin resistance indices calculated by homeostasis model assessment in MC group were significantly higher than in NC group by 1.5 times. However, the insulin resistance was significantly reduced in low-dose and high-dose groups (P<0.05 compared with MC group), whereas the high-dose group showed a more significant improvement (P<0.01 compared with MC group).


Table 3.  Effect of oat beta-glucan on serum glucose, insulin, and homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Dietary group Serum glucose (mmol/L) Insulin (uU/mL) HOMA-IR
NC 7.07±0.48 6.85±0.71 2.21±0.33
MC 9.27±0.15## 8.05±0.12# 3.32±0.07##
PC 7.45±0.54** 6.59±0.38* 2.20±0.23**
Low-dose 8.02±0.25* 7.76±0.12 2.76±0.82*
High-dose 7.80±0.28* 6.85±0.21* 2.38±0.12**
NC=normal control; MC=model control; PC=positive control; Low-dose=low-dose control (200 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); High-dose=high-dose control (500 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); Values are means ± SE (n=10). HOMA-IR=fasting glucose (mmol/L)×fasting insulin (uU/mL)/22.5. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 compared with NC; *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with MC.

Oral glucose tolerance test

Figure 1 depicts the effect of beta-glucan on OGTT. Before the glucose load, the blood glucose levels at 0 time were significantly different among groups. Glucose challenge dramatically raised the blood glucose level of MC group compared with NC group at 30 and 120 min indicating glucose intolerance. However, compared with MC group, the high-dose group showed a significant improvement in oral glucose tolerance. Mice in this group had lower blood glucose levels at 0, 30, and 120 min and marginally decreased blood glucose levels at 30 min (P<0.01 compared with MC group). The low-dose group exhibited no significant reduction of blood glucose levels at 30, 60, and 120 min intervals except 0 min time point compared with that of MC group.

Fig 1

Fig. 1.   Effect of oat beta-glucan on OGTT blood glucose levels.
Values are presented as means±SE (n=10 for each group); NC=normal control; MC=model control; PC=positive control; Low-dose=low-dose control (200 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); High-dose=high-dose control (500 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 compared with NC; *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with MC.

Insulin tolerance test

After an intraperitoneal injection of insulin, the blood glucose levels of all groups decreased rapidly (Fig. 2). The blood glucose level of MC group at 90 min was significantly higher than that of NC group. No significant difference in glucose concentrations was found among groups at 30 and 50 min intervals. Compared with MC group, only the high-dose group showed a significant decrease in blood glucose levels both at 70 and 90 min time points (P<0.05).

Fig 2

Fig. 2.   Effect of oat beta-glucan on ITT blood glucose levels.
Values are presented as means±SE (n=10 for each group); NC=normal control; MC=model control; PC=positive control; Low-dose=low-dose control (200 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); High-dose=high-dose control (500 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 compared with NC; *P<0.05, **P<0.01 compared with MC.

Hepatic glucokinase activity and glycogen content

The MC group experienced a 33.9% reduction in glucokinase activity compared with NC group (Fig. 3). However, there was elevated hepatic glucokinase activity of 25.4 and 30.7%, respectively, in the low-dose and high-dose groups (P<0.05 compared with the MC group). The MC group significantly reduced hepatic glycogen content by 22.0% compared with NC group (Fig. 4). Supplementation of beta-glucan in high-dose group showed a 18.3% (P<0.05) increase in hepatic glycogen level, whereas there was no significant difference in low-dose group compared with MC group.

Fig 3

Fig. 3.   Effect of oat beta-glucan on the hepatic glucokinase.
Values are means for 10 mice with SE represented by vertical bars. The mean value was significantly different from that of the NC group at ##P<0.01, MC group at *P<0.05, **P<0.01. NC=normal control; MC=model control; PC=positive control; Low-dose=low-dose control (200 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan); High-dose=high-dose control (500 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan).

Fig 4

Fig. 4.   Effect of oat beta-glucan on the hepatic glycogen.
Values are means for 10 mice with SE represented by vertical bars. The mean value was significantly different from that of the NC group at ##P<0.01, MC group at *P<0.05, **P<0.01. NC=normal control; MC=model control; PC=positive control; Low-dose=low-dose control (200 mg/kg-1 body weight oat beta-glucan); High-dose=high-dose control (500 mg/kg−1 body weight oat beta-glucan).

Discussion

Currently, obesity and type 2 diabetes have become increasingly common throughout the world. It has been shown that obesity caused by increasing the intake of high-calorie food is a major reason for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (31). Insulin resistance was more prevalent in obese subjects (6) and increased as weight increased (5). Moreover, the obese mice on high-fat diet exhibited the characters of hyperglycemia besides insulin resistance (32).

This study suggested that high-fat and high-fructose diet combined with fructose drinking water for 10 weeks caused overweight, hyperglycemia, mild hyperinsulinemia, and insulin resistance. The low-dose group did not show significant effect on oral glucose tolerance whereas supplementation with high-dose oat beta-glucan was helpful to maintain glucose homeostasis and clear the postprandial glucose load (Fig. 1). Kim and others (33) reported that higher amount of beta-glucan consumption induced a reduced peak and sustained net increment in the late phase (60 and 120 min) of postprandial glucose response in obese women with increased risk for insulin resistance. Tapola and others (34) reported that oat bran flour high in beta-glucan acted as an active ingredient decreasing postprandial glycemic response of an oral glucose load in subjects with type 2 diabetes. Other studies also showed hypoglycemic effects of beta-glucan in postprandial plasma glucose in control of diabetic subjects (35, 36). Compared with the MC group, the high-dose and low-dose groups showed a significant increase in insulin sensitivity at 70, 80, and 90 min in the ITT, which was one of the first developed methods for the assessment of insulin sensitivity in vivo (37).

As exhibited in Table 2, supplementation of beta-glucan inhibited the subsequent development of obesity which was associated with reduced ability of the body to control blood glucose with normal insulin levels (38). Because increased glucose and insulin concentrations were the primary indicators for insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes (4, 39), beta-glucan markedly improved insulin resistance (Table 3) by decreasing fasting serum glucose and insulin levels both in low-dose and high-dose control groups compared with that of MC group. However, the effect of high-dose beta-glucan in alleviating insulin resistance was more significant and close to that of metformin, a biguanide agent that reduces hyperinsulinemia. It is considered that the improved insulin resistance conferred by beta-glucan contributed to the suppressive effect on high-fat and high-fructose diet which induced impaired glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity.

In the present study, the activity of hepatic glucokinase, also called hexokinase IV, was reduced by 34% in MC group compared with NC group which was consistent with the observation that high-fat diet reduced hepatic glucokinase in rats (40). Liver glucokinase activity was also markedly suppressed in animal models of diabetes, including the insulin-deficient streptozotocin model and the insulin-resistant Zucker Diabetic Fatty rat (41, 42). Because insulin induced the transcription of glucokinase gene in the liver (43) and regulated glucokinase expression (44), reduced glucokinase activity was generally attributed to defects in insulin secretion or action. Glucokinase was a major component in the glucose-sensing machinery of mammals and played a fundamental role in glucose homeostasis (45, 46). It has been shown that an increased glucokinase level leads to augmented hepatic glycogen storage and a subsequent reduction in glycemia (47). Conversely, removal of glucokinase resulted in reduced hepatic glycogen deposition and hyperglycemia (48). McGarry (49) reported that insulin reduced the output of hepatic glucose by activating glycogen synthesis and glycolysis, and by inhibiting gluconeogesis.

As described above, insulin, glucokinase, and glycogen were closely interrelated with each other. In the present study, both high-dose and low-dose control groups significantly elevated hepatic glucokinase activity, but only the high-dose group had a marked increase in the glycogen level compared with MC group (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the high-dose group also exhibited a more significant improvement in insulin resistance (P<0.01 compared with MC group), and the effect was dose dependent.

In the high-dose group, the insulin resistance was seemingly mediated by increasing glucokinase activity and reducing hepatic glucose output for liver glycogen deposition to enhance glucose utilization accompanying improvement in oral glucose and insulin tolerance.

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors declare no competing financial interest. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, Project No. 31101258) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Project No. 201104295).

References

  1. Fujimoto WY. The importance of insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 2000; 108: 9S–14. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  2. Goldstein BJ. Insulin resistance as the core defect in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 3G–10. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  3. Tan MH, Bonen A. Their roles in the pathogenesis and management of type II diabetes mellitus. Ann Acad Med 1985; 14: 360–3.
  4. DeFronzo RA, Bonadonna RC, Ferrannini E. Pathogenesis of NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1992; 15: 318–68. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  5. Bloomgarden ZT. The 1st World Congress on the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 602–9. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  6. Vanhala MJ, Pitkajarvi TK, Kumpusalo EA, Takala JK. Obesity type and clustering of insulin resistance-associated cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged men and women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 1988; 22: 369–74. Publisher Full Text
  7. Meigs JB, Rutter MK, Sullivan LM, Fox CS, D’Agostino RB, Wilson PWF. Impact of insulin resistance on risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in people with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1219–25. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  8. Wood PJ, Weisz J, Blackwell BA. Structural studies of (1→3) (1→4)-β-D-glucans by 13C-NMR and by rapid analysis of cellulose-like regions using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography of oligosaccharides released by lichenase. Cereal Chem 1994; 71: 301–7.
  9. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Final rule for food labeling: health claims. Oats and coronary heart disease. Fed Regist 1997; 62: 3584–681.
  10. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Health claims: soluble fibre from certain foods and coronary heart disease (CHD). Fed Regist 2005; 70: 76150–62.
  11. Brennan CS. Dietary fibre, glycaemic response, and diabetes. Mol Nutr Food Res 2005; 49: 560–70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  12. Liatis S, Tsapogas P, Chala E. The consumption of bread enriched with betaglucan reduces LDL-cholesterol and improves insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab 2009; 35: 115–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  13. Behall KM, Scholfield DJ, Hallfrisch J. Comparison of hormone and glucose responses of overweight women to barley and oats. J Am Coll Nutr 2005; 24: 182–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  14. Braaten JT, Scott FW, Wood PJ, Riedel KD, Wolynetz MS, Brule D, et al. High beta-glucan oat bran and oat gum reduce postprandial blood glucose and insulin in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 1994; 11: 312–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  15. Hallfrisch J, Scholfield DJ, Behall KM. Physiological responses of men and women to barley and oat extracts (Nu-trimX). II: comparison of glucose and insulin responses. Cereal Chem 2003; 80: 80–3. Publisher Full Text
  16. Hinata M, Ono M, Midorikawa S, Nakanishi K. Metabolic improvement of male prisoners with type 2 diabetes in Fukushima Prison, Japan. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 77: 327–32. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  17. Kabir M, Oppert JM, Vidal H, Bruzzo F, Fiquet C, Wursch P, et al. Four-week low-glycemic index breakfast with a modest amount of soluble fibers in type 2 diabetic men. Metabolism 2002; 51: 819–26. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  18. Wood PJ, Beer MU, Butler G. Evaluation of role of concentration and molecular weight of oat beta-glucan in determining effect of viscosity on plasma glucose and insulin following an oral glucose load. Br J Nutr 2000; 84: 19–23. PubMed Abstract
  19. Yokoyama WH, Hudson CA, Knuckles BE, Chiu MCM, Sayre RT, Turnlund JR, et al. Effect of barley β-glucan in durum wheat pasta on human glycemic response. Cereal Chem 1997; 74: 293–6. Publisher Full Text
  20. Biörklund M, van Rees A, Mensink RP, Önning G. Changes in serum lipids and postprandial glucose and insulin concentrations after consumption of beverages with β-glucans from oats or barley: a randomised dose-controlled trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 1272–81. Publisher Full Text
  21. Kedia G, Vazquez JA, Pandiella SS. Fermentability of whole oat flour, PeriTec flour and bran by Lactobacillus plantarum. J Food Eng 2008; 89: 246–9. Publisher Full Text
  22. Flander L, Salmenkallio-Marttila M, Suortti T. Optimization of ingredients and baking process for improved wholemeal oat bread quality. LWT-Food Sci Technol 2007; 40: 860–70. Publisher Full Text
  23. Casiraghi MC, Garsetti M, Testolin G, Brighenti F. Post-prandial responses to cereal products enriched with barley β-glucan. J Am Coll Nutr 2006; 25: 313–20. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  24. Theuwissen E, Mensink RP. Simultaneous intake of β-glucan and plant stanol esters affects lipid metabolism in slightly hypercholesterolemic Subjects. J Nutr 2007; 137: 583–8. PubMed Abstract
  25. Shimizu C, Kihara M, Aoe S, Araki S, Ito K, Hayashi K. Effect of high β-glucan barley on serum cholesterol concentrations and visceral fat area in Japanese men-a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 2008; 63: 21–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  26. McCleary BV, Codd R. Measurement of (1-3) (1-4)-β-D-glucan in barley and oats: a streamlined enzymic procedure. J Sci Food Agric 1991; 55: 303–12. Publisher Full Text
  27. Trinder P. Determination of glucose in blood using oxidase with an alternative oxygen acceptor. Ann Clin Biochem 1969; 6: 24–30.
  28. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetalogia 1985; 28: 412–9. Publisher Full Text
  29. Davidson AL, Arion WJ. Factors underlying significant underestimation of glucokinase activity in crude liver extracts: physiological implications of higher cellular activity. Arch Biochem Biophys 1987; 253: 156–67. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  30. Seifter S, Dayton S, Novic B, Muntwyler E. The estimation of glycogen with the anthrone reagent. Arch Biochem Biophys 1950; 50: 191–200.
  31. Friedman JM. A war on obesity, not the obese. Science 2003; 299: 856–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  32. Yun SN, Moon SJ, Ko SK, Im BO, Chung SH. Wild ginseng prevents the onset of high-fat diet induced hyperglycemia and obesity in ICR mice. Arch Pharm Res 2004; 27: 790–6. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  33. Kim H, Stote KS, Behall KM. Glucose and insulin responses to whole grain breakfasts varying in soluble fiber, β-glucan. Eur J Nutr 2009; 48: 170–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  34. Tapola N, Karvonen H, Niskanen L, Mikola M, Sarkkinen E. Glycemic responses of oat bran products in type 2 diabetes patients. Nutr Metab Cardiovas 2005; 15: 255–61. Publisher Full Text
  35. Dong JL, Cai FL, Shen RL, Liu YQ. Hypoglycaemic effects and inhibitory effect on intestinal disaccharidases of oat beta-glucan in streptozotocin-induced diabetic mice. Food Chem 2011; 129: 1066–71. Publisher Full Text
  36. Braaten JT. High β-glucan oat bran and oat gum reduce postprandial blood glucose and insulin in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 1994; 11: 312–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  37. Cederholm J, Wibell L. Insulin release and peripheral sensitivity at the oral glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1990; 28: 751–64.
  38. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classificaction of Diabetes Mellitus. Committee Report. Diabetes Care 1998; 21(Suppl 1): 1–29.
  39. Haffner M, Stern MP, Mitchell BD, Hazuda HP, Pattterson JK. Incidence of type II diabetes in Mexican Americans predicted by fasting insulin and glucose levels, obesity and body fat distribution. Diabetes 1990; 39: 283–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  40. Gustafson LA, Kuipers F, Wiegman C, Sauerwein HP, Romijn JA, Meijer AJ. Clofibrate improves glucose tolerance in fat-fed rats but decrease hepatic glucose consumption capacity. J Hepatol 2002; 37: 425–31. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  41. Brichard SM, Henquin JC, Girard J. Phlorizin treatment of diabetic rats partially reverses the abnormal expression of genes involved in hepatic glucose metabolism. Diabetologia 1993; 36: 292–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  42. Nawano M, Oku A, Ueta K. Hyperglycemia contributes insulin resistance in hepatic and adipose tissue but not skeletal muscle of ZDF rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2000; 278: 535–43.
  43. Ilynedjian PB. Molecular physiology of mammalian glucokinase. Cell Mol Life Sci 2009; 66: 27–42. Publisher Full Text
  44. Magnuson MA, Andreone TL, Printz RL, Koch S, Granner DK. Rat glucokinase gene-structure and regulation by insulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1989; 86: 4838–42. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  45. Tappy L, Dussoix P, Iynedjian P, Henry S, Schneiter P, Zahnd G, et al. Abnormal regulation of insulinoma beta-cells by graded overexpression of glucokinase. Diabetes 1997; 46: 204–8. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  46. Wang H, Iynedjian PB. Modulation of glucose responsiveness of insulinoma beta-cells by graded overexpression of glucokinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1997; 94: 4372–7. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  47. Niswender KD, Shiota M, Postic C, Cherrington AD, Magnuson MA. Effects of increased glucokinase gene copy number on glucose homeostasis and hepatic glucose metabolism. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 22570–5. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  48. Postic C, Shiota M, Niswender KD, Jetton TL, Chen YJ, Moates JM, et al. Dual roles for glucokinase in glucose homeostasis as determined by liver and pancreatic beta cell-specific gene knock-outs using Cre recombinase. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 305–15. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text
  49. McGarry JD. What if Minkowski had been ageusic? An alternative angel on diabetes. Science 1992; 258: 766–70. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

*Guohua Zhao
College of Food Science
Southwest University
2 Tiansheng Road, Beibei District
Chongqing, China
Tel: (86) 023-68251902
Fax: (86) 023-68251902
Email: zhaoguohua1971@163.com