ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Associations of fruit, whole grain, and total energy intakes with gut microbiome diversity and composition
Yixiao Wang1†, Keming Zhang2†, Linna Dai1, Fengya Sun1, Dan Wang1, Sijia Meng1, Jing Zhao1, Yanfang Liu1, Wanting Liu1, Chunyan Li3, Yuan Wang1, Wenli Lu1 and Yun Zhu1*
1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China; 2First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China; 3Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Tianjin, China
Popular scientific summary
- Eating whole grains is linked to a more diverse and beneficial gut microbiota composition.
- Fruit and overall energy intake are associated with specific microbial groups, such as Bacilli and Acidaminococcus.
- Our data emphasize the importance of dietary changes in controlling the makeup of gut bacteria and cultivating a healthier gut environment.
Abstract
Background: The relationship between fruit, whole grain, and total energy consumption and the gut microbiome in the Chinese population remains unclear.
Objective: We investigated the relationship between intakes of fruits, whole grains, and energy, and the diversity and composition of gut microbiota.
Design: This cross-sectional study included 167 subjects aged 40-75 years who underwent colonoscopy at Nankai Hospital in Tianjin, China. Each of the participants completed a personal history questionnaire, a 7-day dietary record, and donated a fecal sample. The V3-V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNAgene was amplified and sequenced using Illumina Novaseq. The relationship between diet and gut microbiota was evaluated in terms of both the overall composition and the abundance of specific taxon.
Results: Fruits intake was positively related to the abundance of Bacilli, Porphyromonadaceae, Streptococcaceae, Parabacteroides, Streptococcus, and Bilophila in fecal samples. Higher whole grains intake was associated with higher microbial diversity, as measured by Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indices. Specifically, there was a significant increase inthe relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae and a decrease in Actinobacteria with increased whole grains intake. Moreover, higher intake of total energy was associated with a lower abundance of Anaerostipes and a higher abundance of Lactobacillales and Acidaminococcus.
Conclusion: Whole grains intake was positively associated with gut microbial diversity. Fruits and total energy intake were related to the abundance of specifictaxon (e.g., Bacilli and Acidaminococcus). These findings highlight the potential importance of dietary interventions for modulating gut microbiota composition and promoting overall health.
Keywords: gut microbiota; fruits; whole grains; total energy
Citation: Food & Nutrition Research 2023, 67: 9725 - http://dx.doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.9725
Copyright: © 2023 Yixiao Wang et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
Received: 24 May 2023; Revised: 4 July 2023; Accepted: 5 July 2023; Published: 5 December 2023
*Yun Zhu, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, 22 Qixiangtai Road, Tianjin, 300070, China. Email: yun.zhu@tmu.edu.cn
†These authors contributed equally to this work.
Competing interests and funding: The authors declare no conflict of interest. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant No. 82003533) and the CNS-ZD Tizhi and Health Fund (grant No. CNS-ZD2020-82).
The human intestinal tract harbors an extremely complex and large microbiota, with microorganisms adding up to around 100 trillion in number. This microbiota interacts with the host via various physiological processes, such as shaping the intestinal epithelium, aiding food digestion and energy metabolism, regulating host immune function, and maintaining intestinal homeostasis (1–3). Gut dysbiosis can lead to a range of health problems, including inflammatory bowel disease (4), obesity (5), diabetes (6,7) and autoimmune diseases (8).
The composition and diversity of the intestinal microbiota are dynamic and can be influenced by various factors, including host genetics, immune response, antibiotic use, exercise, and diet (9–11). Among the various dietary components, fruits and whole grains are considered to be particularly beneficial due to their high fiber content and associated prebiotic effects (12–14). Current research suggests that consuming fruits and whole grains is associated with a more diverse and beneficial gut microbiota composition. Specifically, fruits are rich in fiber, polyphenols, and other nutrients that can promote the growth of beneficial bacteria, such as Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus, while inhibiting the growth of harmful bacteria (15). Whole grains, which contain fiber, resistant starch, and other prebiotics, have also been found to increase the abundance of beneficial bacteria in the gut (e.g. Prevotella and Roseburia) by attenuating oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in serum (16,17). In contrast, research has suggested that overconsumption of calories can lead to a less diverse and less healthy gut microbiome through several mechanisms, including promoting inflammation, altering gut motility, and inducing metabolic dysfunction (18).
Despite the existing research on the association of fruits, whole grains, and total energy intakes with gut microbiome diversity, many questions remain unanswered. For instance, although short-term trials have shown that fruits, whole grains, and total energy can affect gut microbiome composition, it is not clear how habitual intake of these dietary factors impacts the microbiome. Additionally, because food culture and microbiota structure can vary greatly across geographical regions (19,20), and Chinese dietary customs are distinct from those of other nations, reflecting unique cultural practices and beliefs regarding food selection, preparation, and consumption, it is crucial to explore the relationship between diet and the microbiome, specifically in the Chinese population. However, research in this area remains limited.
Therefore, this study explored the associations between fruits, whole grains, and total energy intakes with gut microbiome diversity and composition in a Chinese population. By shedding light on these associations, we may gain a better understanding of the role that diet plays in shaping the gut microbiome, which could have implications for the development of personalized dietary interventions to improve human health.
Materials and methods
Study participants
We conducted a cross-sectional study as part of the Colorectal Cancer Screening Project in Tianjin, China. Individuals who underwent colonoscopy at Tianjin Nankai Hospital between March 2021 and March 2022 and aged between 40 and 75 years were eligible for inclusion. We further excluded: 1) individuals who had taken prebiotics, probiotics, synbiotics, antibiotics, or undergone radiation therapy within the past three months; 2) women who were pregnant or lactating; 3) individuals with immune deficiencies; 4) individuals with chronic or acute gastrointestinal disorders requiring medical attention, such as acute gastroenteritis, peptic ulcer, or dysentery; 5) those with infections in other areas of the body; 6) those diagnosed with familial adenomatous polyposis; 7) individuals with malignant tumors or who had undergone colorectal surgery, except for non-melanoma skin cancer; and 8) individuals with behavioral constraints, cognitive impairment, or who were extremely frail and unable to participate in the study. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at Tianjin Nankai Hospital. All 167 subjects included in the analysis provided informed consent prior to participating in the study.
Data collection
Lifestyle and diet assessment
Participants completed a personal history questionnaire regarding their health and lifestyle and a 7-day food record. Nutrient and total energy intakes were calculated by multiplying the food intake (in grams) by the corresponding nutrient content per gram based on the 2017 China Food Composition List (Volume 1, Second Edition).
Stool samples collection
Subjects were given fecal collection tools and instructed on how to collect fecal samples. Fresh fecal samples were collected from participants, immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and transported to the lab within 48 hours. These samples were stored at -80°C for DNA extraction and gut microbiota sequencing.
DNA extraction and sequencing
Total DNA of microorganisms in fecal samples was extracted using the Stool Genomic DNA Extraction Kit (Solarbio, China), and the extracted DNA products were stored at -80°C for backup. The quantity and quality of genomic DNA were measured using the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using specific primers 341F (5’-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3’) and 805R (5’-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3’). The PCR products were purified using AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter, Indianapolis, IN), and the quantization was performed using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit. The Illumina Novaseq 6000 SP PE250 (DiaCarta, Inc) was used for sequencing.
The data of each sample were split from the original data according to barcode sequences and primer sequences, and controlled and filtered for quality. Low-quality sequences were identified based on the following criteria: sequences less than 150bp, average mass below 20, lines containing ambiguous orders and sequences greater than 8bp, and lines containing single nucleotide repeats. Chimeric sequences were further removed.
Bioinformatics analysis
In the study, the Vsearch-1.11.1 software was used to assign effective tags to operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a similarity threshold of >97%. The representative sequences from each OTU were annotated using default parameters and the Green Gene database to generate lists of OTUs. The community composition of each sample was calculated at each taxonomic level (i.e. kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species). The OTUs containing less than 0.001% of the total rows in all models were removed. QIIME (version 1.7.1) was used to calculate alpha diversity indices, including Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1, while beta diversity indices were calculated using weighted Unifrac (21,22). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was performed using WGCNA, stat, and ggplot2 in R software (version 2.15.3). Differences in Unifrac were compared using T-test and the Monte Carlo permutation test. The PERMANOVA (Permutational multivariate analysis of variance) method (23) was used to evaluate intergroup differentiation of microbial community structure.
Statistical analysis
Data analysis was performed using SAS 9.4 software. Subjects were divided into three groups (low, medium and high intake groups) based on their tertile intakes of whole grains, fruits and total energy, respectively. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test for normality. Normally distributed continuous variables were described using mean ± standard deviation (x ± s), and one-way ANOVA was used to compare groups. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were described using median and interquartile range, and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between groups. Categorical variables were described using composition ratios, and the chi-square test was used to compare between groups. We examined the relationship between dietary intakes and alpha diversity metrics (Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1) using multivariable linear regression analysis. Factors associated with gut microbiota in the literature were assessed as potential confounders. For instance, higher body mass index was associated with reduced levels of Alistipes finegoldii and Alistipes senegalensis, while increased yogurt intake correlated strongly with higher abundance of Leuconostoc mesenteroides and Lactococcus lactis (24). Smoking was found to decrease the abundance of parabobacterides distasonis and Lactobacillus spp., while simultaneously increasing the levels of Eggerthella lenta (25,26). These variables underwent stepwise selection, with a significance threshold of P < 0.05 for inclusion in the final model. The final list of covariates comprised age, sex, body mass index, fried and barbecue food intake, tea intake, yogurt intake, probiotic drink intake, alcohol consumption, smoking, and drug use. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare the differences of microbial community abundance in different food intake groups at class, family, genus, order and phylum levels. A P-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age, BMI, waistline, fried and barbecue food consumption, tea consumption, yogurt and probiotic drink intake, and alcohol drinking (P > 0.05). However, current smokers were more likely to have a low fruit intake than non-smokers (P = 0.012). Individuals having higher family income tended to consume more fruits and total energy (Table 1).
α-Diversity indices by food intakes
The Shannon, Simpson, and Chao1 indices were used to assess the species richness and diversity in different intake groups (Table 2). The results demonstrated that there were significant differences in the diversity of the gut microbiota across the whole grains intake groups, with the high whole grains intake group having the highest species richness (P for Shannon diversity index = 0.0381; P for Chao1 diversity index = 0.0260). No significant differences were found in any of the diverse indices across groups defined by fruits and total energy intakes.
β-Diversity by food intakes
The Weighted Unifrac Distances analysis detected compositional dissimilarities (β-diversity) of the gut microbiota across different groups defined by total energy intake (Figure 1C, P for PCoA1 = 0.036), although no apparent clustering was observed among the groups defined by whole grains and fruits intakes.
Fig. 1. Variation in the gut microbiota composition represented by unconstrained PCoA based on the distance indexes (A–C).
Associations between dietary intakes and relative abundances of taxa
Our findings indicated that individuals with increased fruits intake demonstrated a marked increase in Bacilli richness at the class level and in Porphyromonadaceae and Streptococcus richness at the family level. At the genus level, the richness of Parabacteroides, Streptococcus, and Bilophila increased significantly, consequent to augmented fruits consumption (Table 3).
While the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Gammaproteobacteria, Clostridiales, Barnesiellaceae, Ruminococcaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, and Klebsiella exhibited significant intergroup differences, no discernible dose-response relationship with fruits intake was observed.
Similarly, increased whole grains intake was associated with a significant decrease in Actinobacteria abundance at both phylum and class levels and in Bifidobacterium abundance at the order, family and genus levels. Conversely, we observed an overrepresentation of Lachnospiraceae at the family level and an increase of Roseburia at the genus level with increased whole grains consumption.
As for energy intake, an increase in the abundance of Lactobacillales and Acidaminococcus, along with a decrease in the richness of Anaerostipes, was observed with increased total energy intake. There were no significant differences in the relative abundance of other taxa.
Discussions
Our data indicated that the consumption of whole grains was positively associated with greater gut microbial diversity, whereas fruits intake and total energy intake appeared to have a more limited effect on microbial diversity. Additionally, an increase in the intake of whole grains was associated with a significant rise in the relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae and Roseburia, as well as a decrease in Actinobacteria and Bifidobacterium. A higher intake of fruits had a positive correlation with the abundance of Bacilli, Porphyromonadaceae, Streptococcaceae, Parabacteroides, Streptococcus, and Bilophila in fecal samples. On the other hand, a higher intake of total energy appeared to be linked with a lower abundance of Anaerostipes, and a higher abundance of Lactobacillales and Acidaminococcus.
Recent studies have investigated the relationship between whole grains intake and gut microbiota diversity and abundance, with varying results. Consistent with the findings of our data, most studies (27–30), but not all (31), found that individuals who consume whole grains have a more diverse gut microbiota. Consuming whole grains promotes a more diverse gut microbiota due to the variety of complex carbohydrates and nutrients (e.g. dietary fiber and prebiotics) present in whole grains, which provide substrates for the growth of diverse bacterial species in the gut.
In terms of gut microbiota abundance, our findings are in line with an earlier study of 1717 individuals with diverse ethnic backgrounds, in which the consumption of whole grains products was associated with a reduction in the relative abundance of Actinobacteria at the phylum level, in contrast to refined grains intake (32). The effect of Actinobacteria on health varies depending on the context. While some species, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Corynebacterium diphtheriae, and Tropheryma whipplei, are associated with diseases like tuberculosis, diphtheria, and Whipple’s disease (33), most Actinobacteria have positive effects; Bifidobacteria, particularly, are widely used as probiotics and show beneficial effects in various pathological conditions. Additionally, our study replicated prior findings demonstrating a noticeable increase in the abundance of Roseburia at the genus level subsequent to increased whole grains consumption (32). Evidence suggests that Roseburia has a positive influence on inflammatory bowel disease, alcoholic fatty liver, colorectal cancer, and metabolic syndrome, positioning it as a potential ‘Next Generation Probiotic’ (34).
Existing small-scale whole grains intervention trials yield inconclusive findings. The majority of intervention trials indicated a correlation between the consumption of whole grains and elevated levels of certain beneficial gut bacteria, such as Bifidobacterium (35–37), Lactobacillus (35) and Firmicutes (38). Likewise, Vitaglione et al. demonstrated an increase in Prevotella levels following an intervention involving whole grain consumption (39). In contrast, another randomized crossover study conducted on 33 healthy individuals with low habitual whole grain consumption did not replicate these findings. That study reported that increased intake of whole grains had no significant influence on the abundance of gut microbiota (40). Despite prior evidence suggesting a positive relationship between the intake of whole grains and the abundance of Bifidobacterium and Prevotella, the present study did not yield any such association. It is worth noting that differences in study design, sample size, methods for analyzing gut microbiota, and the compositional complexity of whole grains, which contain a variety of carbohydrates, can all contribute to varying results in these types of studies. Further investigation is necessary to comprehensively elucidate the correlation between consumption of whole grains and the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota, particularly through conducting large-scale clinical trials.
Multiple studies have shown that increased fruits intake is associated with increased gut microbial diversity and abundance. Our findings regarding the link between fruits consumption and gut microbiota are consistent with prior research which has indicated that the polyphenols found in plant-based diets can promote the growth of beneficial bacteria, including Porphyromonas, while also regulating the balance of gut microbes and hindering the growth of harmful bacteria (41,42). A study on 37 well-nourished Australian children aged between 2 and 3 years exhibited that Prevotella increases with the consumption of a plant-based diet (43). However, in our study, we could not find any significant relationship between this flora and fruits consumption. Conversely, that study displayed a negative correlation between fruits intake and the relative abundance of bacteria linked to Ruminococcus gnavus.
The mechanisms underlying the association between fruits intake and gut microbiota are not yet fully understood. Fruits consumption may impact gut bacteria by providing prebiotic fibers, which can stimulate the growth and function of beneficial bacteria (44,45). In addition, gut bacteria can produce short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) through the fermentation of dietary fibers, which have multiple health benefits, including reducing inflammation and improving gut barrier function (46,47). Some evidence suggests that fruits intake may enhance SCFA production by fostering the growth of fiber-fermenting gut bacteria. Further research is required to determine the specific types and amounts of fruits that are most advantageous for gut health and to comprehensively comprehend the underlying mechanisms.
Elevated calorie consumption, particularly from diets high in fat and sugar, has the potential to alter the composition of gut microbiota, leading to a decline in beneficial bacteria and an increase in harmful ones. A study in mice found that a high-calorie ‘Western’ diet decreased Bacteroidetes and increased Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. The effects became stronger with higher diet intake (48). In the current investigation, an increase in total energy intake was associated with a rise in Lactobacillales abundance at the order level. At the genus level, the richness of Anaerostipes declined, whereas the richness of Acidaminococcus increased following high total energy consumption. These findings are noteworthy, as Lactobacillales and Acidaminococcus have been identified as significant contributors to sleep disorders (49) and immune-related adverse events, respectively (50). Contrarily, an increased presence of Anaerostipes has been associated with a protective effect against certain health conditions, including Cushing’s syndrome (51). In a randomized controlled trial involving overweight/obese men and women with metabolic syndrome, the experimental group with restricted energy intake following a Mediterranean diet pattern experienced changes in their intestinal microbiota, including a decrease in Butyricicoccus, while Haemophilus, Ruminiclostridium, and Eubacterium hallii increased. Nonetheless, our study did not reveal any significant associations or trends between total energy intake and the aforementioned flora; further research is required to elucidate the specific mechanisms involved (52).
Furthermore, alterations in gut microbiota beta diversity have been observed in several diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease, irritable bowel syndrome, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and mental health disorders (53–55). However, it remains uncertain whether and how the distinct microbial clusters influenced by total energy intake are linked to individual health, necessitating further investigation. It should be noted that alterations in beta diversity alone may not directly trigger these conditions, but instead, they may indicate dysbiosis or imbalances in the gut microbiota.
Our study was characterized by strengths that involved the utilization of 7-day dietary diaries, which offered several advantages over food questionnaires in capturing food consumption, including more detailed and accurate recording of intake over several days, allowing for a more detailed analysis of nutrient content, and providing a more accurate measure of energy intake. The cross-sectional design of our study precluded establishing causality or assessing diet-induced changes in the microbiome. To address these limitations, a longitudinal study with a long-term follow-up is required. Future research directions should involve investigating the impact of specific food items or nutrients on the composition of the gut microbiota. It is recommended that these studies adopt a longitudinal approach, incorporate larger sample sizes, and employ more precise nutrient assessment techniques, such as the utilization of blood biomarkers.
Conclusions
The consumption of whole grains demonstrated a positive correlation with gut microbial diversity, whereas the intake of fruits and overall energy was found to be associated with the prevalence of specific taxonomic groups such as Bacilli and Acidaminococcus. These observations underscore the potential significance of dietary interventions in regulating the composition of gut microbiota and fostering a healthy gut microbiome. This knowledge can potentially lead to the development of dietary recommendations tailored to the Chinese population.
Informed consent statement
Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.
Authors’ contributions
Conceptualization, Y.Z., WL.L., and Y.W.; methodology, Y.Z., WL.L., and Y.W.; software, YX.W.; validation, Y.W., J.Z., L.D., Y.Z.; formal analysis, Y.W.; investigation, Y.Z., WL.L., and Y.W.; resources, WL.L., C.L. and K.Z.; data curation, YX.W., L.D., F.S., D.W., S.M., J.Z., Y.L., W.L., K.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, YX.W., L.D., F.S., J.Z., Y.L.; writing—review and editing, YX.W., L.D., F.S., D.W., S.M., J.Z., Y.L.; Y.Z., W.L., and Y.W.; supervision, Y.Z., C.L., K.Z., WL.L., and Y.W.; project administration, Y.Z., WL.L., and Y.W.; funding acquisition, Y.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
| 1. | Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021; 71(3): 209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 |
| 2. | Simpson HL, Campbell BJ. Review article: dietary fibre- microbiota interactions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2015; 42(2): 158–79. doi:10.1111/apt.13248 |
| 3. | Bultman SJ. Interplay between diet, gut microbiota, epigenetic events, and colorectal cancer. Mol Nutr Food Res 2017; 61(1): 1–21. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201500902 |
| 4. | Matsuoka K, Kanai T. The gut microbiota and inflammatory bowel disease. Semin Immunopathol 2015; 37(1): 47–55. doi: 10.1007/s00281-014-0454-4 |
| 5. | Liu BN, Liu XT, Liang ZH, Wang JH. Gut microbiota in obesity. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(25): 3837–50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3837 |
| 6. | Han H, Li Y, Fang J, Liu G, Yin J, Li T, et al. Gut microbiota and type 1 Diabetes. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19(4): 995. doi: 10.3390/ijms19040995 |
| 7. | Zhou Z, Sun B, Yu D, Zhu C. Gut microbiota: An important player in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12: 834485. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.834485 |
| 8. | Mousa WK, Chehadeh F, Husband S. Microbial dysbiosis in the gut drives systemic autoimmune diseases. Front Immunol 2022; 13: 906258. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.906258 |
| 9. | Bibbo S, Ianiro G, Giorgio V, Scaldaferri F, Masucci L, Gasbarrini A, et al. The role of diet on gut microbiota composition. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2016; 20(22): 4742–49. |
| 10. | Kataoka K. The intestinal microbiota and its role in human health and disease. J Med Invest 2016; 63(1–2): 27–37. doi: 10.2152/jmi.63.27 |
| 11. | Donati Zeppa S, Agostini D, Gervasi M, Annibalini G, Amatori S, Ferrini F, et al. Mutual interactions among exercise, sport supplements and microbiota. Nutrients 2019; 12(1): 17. doi: 10.3390/nu12010017 |
| 12. | Dreher ML. Whole fruits and fruit fiber emerging health effects. Nutrients 2018; 10(12): 1833. doi: 10.3390/nu10121833 |
| 13. | Foerster J, Maskarinec G, Reichardt N, Tett A, Narbad A, Blaut M, et al. The influence of whole grain products and red meat on intestinal microbiota composition in normal weight adults: a randomized crossover intervention trial. PLoS One 2014; 9(10): e109606. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109606 |
| 14. | Markowiak P, Slizewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients 2017; 9(9): 1021. doi: 10.3390/nu9091021 |
| 15. | Wang Y, Qi W, Guo X, Song G, Pang S, Fang W, et al. Effects of oats, tartary buckwheat, and foxtail millet supplementation on lipid metabolism, oxido-inflammatory responses, gut microbiota, and colonic SCFA composition in High-Fat Diet Fed rats. Nutrients 2022; 14(14): 2760. doi: 10.3390/nu14132760 |
| 16. | P NPV. Joye IJ. Dietary fibre from whole grains and their benefits on metabolic health. Nutrients 2020; 12(10): 3045. doi: 10.3390/nu12103045 |
| 17. | Lattimer JM, Haub MD. Effects of dietary fiber and its components on metabolic health. Nutrients 2010; 2(12): 1266–89. doi: 10.3390/nu2121266 |
| 18. | Singh RK, Chang HW, Yan D, Lee KM, Ucmak D, Wong K, et al. Influence of diet on the gut microbiome and implications for human health. J Transl Med 2017; 15: 73. doi: 10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y |
| 19. | Belcheva A, Irrazabal T, Robertson SJ, Streutker C, Maughan H, Rubino S, et al. Gut microbial metabolism drives transformation of MSH2-deficient colon epithelial cells. Cell 2014; 158(2): 288–99. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.051 |
| 20. | Mingyang S, Chat AT, Sun J. Influence of the gut microbiome, diet, and environment on risk of colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 2020; 158(2): 322–40. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.06.048 |
| 21. | Lozupone CA, Hamady M, Kelley ST, Knight R. Quantitative and qualitative beta diversity measures lead to different insights into factors that structure microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73(5): 1576–85. |
| 22. | Lozupone C, Knight R. UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005; 71(12): 8228–35. |
| 23. | McArdle BH, Anderson MJ. Fitting multivariate models to community data: A comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology. 2001; 82(1): 290–7. |
| 24. | Zhernakova A, Kurilshikov A, Bonder MJ, Tigchelaar EF, Schirmer M, Vatanen T, et al. Population-based metagenomics analysis reveals markers for gut microbiome composition and diversity. Science 2016; 352: 565–9. doi: 10.1126/science.aad3369 |
| 25. | Fan J, Zhou Y, Meng R, Tang J, Zhu J, Aldrich MC, et al. Cross-talks between gut microbiota and tobacco smoking: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study. BMC Med 2023; 21(1): 163. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02863-1 |
| 26. | Bai X, Wei H, Liu W, Coker OO, Gou H, Liu C, et al. Cigarette smoke promotes colorectal cancer through modulation of gut microbiota and related metabolites. Gut 2022; 71(12): 2439–50. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325021 |
| 27. | Kang JW, Tang X, Walton CJ, Brown MJ, Brewer RA, Maddela RL, et al. Multi-Omic analyses reveal bifidogenic effect and metabolomic shifts in healthy human cohort supplemented with a prebiotic dietary fiber blend. Front Nutr 2022; 9: 908534. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.908534 |
| 28. | Zhang Y, Chen H, Lu M, Cai J, Lu B, Luo C, et al. Habitual diet pattern associations with gut microbiome diversity and composition: results from a Chinese Adult Cohort. Nutrients 2022; 14(13): 2639. doi: 10.3390/nu14132639 |
| 29. | Um CY, Peters BA, Choi HS, Oberstein P, Beggs DB, Usyk M, et al. Grain, gluten, and dietary fiber intake influence gut microbial diversity: data from the food and microbiome longitudinal investigation. Cancer Res Commun 2023; 3(1): 43–53. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0154 |
| 30. | Zeyneb H, Pei H, Cao X, Wang Y, Win Y, Gong L. In vitro study of the effect of quinoa and quinoa polysaccharides on human gut microbiota. Food Sci Nutr 2021; 9(10): 5735–45. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2540 |
| 31. | Li L, Houghton D, Lietz G, Watson A, Stewart CJ, Bal W, et al. Impact of daily consumption of whole-grain Quinoa-Enriched bread on gut microbiome in males. Nutrients 2022; 14(22): 4888. doi: 10.3390/nu14224888 |
| 32. | Vanegas SM, Meydani M, Barnett JB, Goldin B, Kane A, Rasmussen H, et al. Substituting whole grains for refined grains in a 6-wk randomized trial has a modest effect on gut microbiota and immune and inflammatory markers of healthy adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2017; 105(3): 635–50. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.146928 |
| 33. | Lewin GR, Carlos C, Chevrette MG, Horn HA, McDonald BR, Stankey RJ, et al. Evolution and ecology of actinobacteria and their bioenergy applications. Annu Rev Microbiol 2016; 70: 235–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-102215-095748 |
| 34. | Chao Z, Kejia M, Kai N, Minzi D, Weiwei L, Xing W, et al. Assessment of the safety and probiotic properties of Roseburia intestinalis: a potential ‘Next Generation Probiotic’. Frontiers in Microbiology 2022; 13: 973046. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.973046 |
| 35. | Costabile A, Klinder A, Fava F, Napolitano A, Fogliano V, Leonard C, et al. Whole-grain wheat breakfast cereal has a prebiotic effect on the human gut microbiota: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Br J Nutr 2008; 99(1): 110–20. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507793923 |
| 36. | Christensen EG, Licht TR, Kristensen M, Bahl MI. Bifidogenic effect of whole-grain wheat during a 12-week energy-restricted dietary intervention in postmenopausal women. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67(12): 1316–21. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.207 |
| 37. | Carvalho-Wells AL, Helmolz K, Nodet C, Molzer C, Leonard C, McKevith B, et al. Determination of the in vivo prebiotic potential of a maize-based whole grain breakfast cereal: a human feeding study. Br J Nutr 2010; 104(9): 1353–56. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510002084 |
| 38. | Martinez I, Lattimer JM, Hubach KL, Case JA, Yang J, Weber CG, et al. Gut microbiome composition is linked to whole grain-induced immunological improvements. ISME J 2013; 7(2): 269–80. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.104 |
| 39. | Vitaglione P, Mennella I, Ferracane R, Rivellese AA, Giacco R, Ercolini D, et al. Whole-grain wheat consumption reduces inflammation in a randomized controlled trial on overweight and obese subjects with unhealthy dietary and lifestyle behaviors: role of polyphenols bound to cereal dietary fiber. Am J Clin Nutr 2015; 101(2): 251–61. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.088120 |
| 40. | Ampatzoglou A, Atwal KK, Maidens CM, Williams CL, Ross AB, Thielecke F, et al. Increased whole grain consumption does not affect blood biochemistry, body composition, or gut microbiology in healthy, low-habitual whole grain consumers. J Nutr 2015; 145(2): 215–21. doi: 10.3945/jn.114.202176 |
| 41. | Duenas M, Munoz-Gonzalez I, Cueva C, Jimenez-Giron A, Sanchez-Patan F, Santos-Buelga C, et al. A survey of modulation of gut microbiota by dietary polyphenols. Biomed Res Int 2015; 2015: 850902. doi: 10.1155/2015/850902 |
| 42. | Smith AH, Mackie RI. Effect of condensed tannins on bacterial diversity and metabolic activity in the rat gastrointestinal tract. Appl Environ Microbiol 2004; 70(2): 1104–15. doi: 10.1128/AEM.70.2.1104-1115.2004 |
| 43. | Smith-Brown P, Morrison M, Krause L, Davies PS. Dairy and plant based food intakes are associated with altered faecal microbiota in 2 to 3 year old Australian children. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 32385. doi: 10.1038/srep32385 |
| 44. | Cani PD. The colon matters in blood sugar management: how prebiotic fibers can work in gut microbiota, glucose metabolism and metabolic disorders. Ann Nutr Metabol 2017; 71: 132–3. |
| 45. | Borgonovi TF, Virgolin LB, Janzantti NS, Casarotti SN, Penna ALB. Fruit bioactive compounds: effect on lactic acid bacteria and on intestinal microbiota. Food Res Int 2022; 161: 111809. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111809 |
| 46. | Unno T, Tanaka H, Kohara A. Consumption of young barley leaf extract increases fecal short-chain fatty acid levels: a before-after clinical trial. Food Res 2020; 4(4): 1151–5. |
| 47. | Chun-Han L, Raaj SM, Long HN, Yiqing W, Wenjie M, Kai W, et al. 802 empirical dietary pattern associated with short-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria in relation to colorectal cancer risk. Gastroenterology 2021; 160(6): S165–66. doi: 10.1016/S0016-5085(21)01147-1 |
| 48. | Turnbaugh PJ, Bäckhed F, Fulton L, Gordon JI. Diet-induced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 2008; 3: 213–23. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2008.02.015 |
| 49. | Niu Z, Wu L, Kang J, Bai J, Chen Y, Xia H. Regulation of sleep disorders in patients with traumatic brain injury by intestinal flora based on the background of brain-gut axis
. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2022; 16: 934822. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.934822 |
| 50. | Hamada K, Isobe J, Hattori K, Hosonuma M, Baba Y, Murayama M, et al. Turicibacter and acidaminococcus predict immune-related adverse events and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor. Front Immunol 2023; 14: 1164724. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1164724 |
| 51. | Qin Z, Mu HW, Ling DY, Jing WJ, Jun WY, Ping J. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota and decreased propionic acid associated with metabolic abnormality in Cushing’s syndrome
. Front Endocrinol 2023; 13: 1095438. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1095438 |
| 52. | Muralidharan J, Moreno-Indias I, Bullo M, Lopez JV, Corella D, Castaner O, et al. Effect on gut microbiota of a 1-y lifestyle intervention with Mediterranean diet compared with energy-reduced Mediterranean diet and physical activity promotion: PREDIMED-Plus Study. Am J Clin Nutr 2021; 114(3): 1148–58. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab150 |
| 53. | Zhu S, Han M, Liu S, Fan L, Shi H, Li P. Composition and diverse differences of intestinal microbiota in ulcerative colitis patients. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2022; 12: 953962. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.953962 |
| 54. | Tang B, Hu Y, Chen J, Su C, Zhang Q, Huang C. Oral and fecal microbiota in patients with diarrheal irritable bowel syndrome. Heliyon 2023; 9(1): e13114. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13114 |
| 55. | Lin P, Li D, Shi Y, Li Q, Guo X, Dong K, et al. Dysbiosis of the Gut Microbiota and Kynurenine (Kyn) pathway activity as potential biomarkers in patients with major depressive disorder. Nutrients 2023; 15(7): 1752. doi: 10.3390/nu15071752 |