The clinicians’ view of food-related obstacles for treating eating disorders: A qualitative study

Billy Langlet; Maria Nyberg; Karin Wendin; Modjtaba Zandian

doi:10.29219/fnr.v67.8771

Billy Langlet Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Maria Nyberg Food and Meals in Everyday Life (MEAL), Department of Food and Meal Science, Kristianstad University
Karin Wendin Food and Meals in Everyday Life (MEAL), Department of Food and Meal Science, Kristianstad University
Modjtaba Zandian Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.8771

Keywords: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, thematic analysis, focus groups, healthy; unhealthy, calories, taste, texture

Abstract

Background: Good health requires healthy eating. However, individuals with eating disorders, such as anorexia nervosa, require treatment to modify their dietary behaviours and prevent health complications. There is no consensus on the best treatment practices and treatment outcomes are usually poor. While normalising eating behaviour is a cornerstone in treatment, few studies have focused on eating and food-related obstacles to treatment.

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate clinicians’ perceived food-related obstacles to treatment of eating disorders (EDs).

Design: Qualitative focus group discussions were conducted with clinicians involved in eating disorder treatment to get an understanding of their perceptions and beliefs regarding food and eating among eating disorder patients. Thematic analysis was used to find common patterns in the collected material.

Results: From the thematic analysis the following five themes were identified: (1) ideas about healthy and unhealthy food, (2) calculating with calories, (3) taste, texture, and temperature as an excuse, (4) the problems with hidden ingredients and (5) the challenges of extra food.

Discussion: All identified themes showed not only connections to each other but also some overlap. All themes were associated with a requirement of control, where food may be perceived as a threat, with the effects of food consumption resulting in a perceived net loss, rather than a gain. This mindset can greatly influence decision making.

Conclusions: The results of this study are based on experience and practical knowledge that could improve future ED treatments by enhancing our understanding the challenges certain foods pose for patients. The results may also help to improve dietary plans by including and explaining challenges for patients at different stages of treatment. Future studies could further investigate the causes and best treatment practices for people suffering from EDs and other eating disturbances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.
Chen PJ, Antonelli M. Conceptual models of food choice: influential factors related to foods, individual differences, and society. Foods Basel Switz 2020; 9(12): E1898. doi: 10.3390/foods9121898

2.
Healthy diet. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet [cited 13 May 2022].

3.
Wongprawmas R, Mora C, Pellegrini N, Guiné RPF, Carini E, Sogari G, et al. Food choice determinants and perceptions of a healthy diet among Italian consumers. Foods Basel Switz 2021; 10(2): 318. doi: 10.3390/foods10020318

4.
Altheimer G, Urry HL. Do emotions cause eating? The role of previous experiences and social context in emotional eating. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2019; 28(3): 234–40. doi: 10.1177/0963721419837685

5.
Guertin C, Pelletier L, Pope P. The validation of the Healthy and Unhealthy Eating Behavior Scale (HUEBS): examining the interplay between stages of change and motivation and their association with healthy and unhealthy eating behaviors and physical health. Appetite 2020; 144: 104487. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104487

6.
Zandian M, Ioakimidis I, Bergh C, Södersten P. Linear eaters turned decelerated: reduction of a risk for disordered eating? Physiol Behav 2009; 96(4): 518–21. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2008.11.017

7.
Romano KA, Lipson SK. Dietary restraint patterns and eating disorder help-seeking. Eat Weight Disord EWD 2021; 26(1). Available from: https://pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.proxy.kib.ki.se/31853888/ [cited 13 May 2022].

8.
Teo PS, van Dam RM, Whitton C, Tan LWL, Forde CG. Consumption of foods with higher energy intake rates is associated with greater energy intake, adiposity, and cardiovascular risk factors in adults. J Nutr 2021; 151(2): 370–8. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa344

9.
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th edition: DSM-5. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013, 991 p.

10.
Walsh BT. The importance of eating behavior in eating disorders. Physiol Behav 2011; 104(4): 525–9. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.05.007

11.
Culbert KM, Racine SE, Klump KL. Research review: what we have learned about the causes of eating disorders – a synthesis of sociocultural, psychological, and biological research. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2015; 56(11): 1141–64. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12441

12.
Neumark-Sztainer D, Hannan PJ. Weight-related behaviors among adolescent girls and boys: results from a national survey. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000; 154(6): 569–77. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.154.6.569

13.
Westmoreland P, Krantz MJ, Mehler PS. Medical complications of anorexia nervosa and bulimia. Am J Med 2016; 129(1): 30–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.031

14.
Arcelus J, Mitchell AJ, Wales J, Nielsen S. Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. A meta-analysis of 36 studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68(7): 724–31. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.74

15.
van den Berg E, Houtzager L, de Vos J, Daemen I, Katsaragaki G, Karyotaki E, et al. Meta-analysis on the efficacy of psychological treatments for anorexia nervosa. Eur Eat Disord Rev J Eat Disord Assoc 2019; 27(4): 331–51. doi: 10.1002/erv.2683

16.
Ozier AD, Henry BW, American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: nutrition intervention in the treatment of eating disorders. J Am Diet Assoc 2011; 111(8): 1236–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.09.007

17.
Zipfel S, Giel KE, Bulik CM, Hay P, Schmidt U. Anorexia nervosa: aetiology, assessment, and treatment. Lancet Psychiatry 2015; 2(12): 1099–111. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00356-9

18.
American Psychiatric Association. Treatment of patients with eating disorders, third edition. American Psychiatric Association. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163(7 Suppl): 4–54.

19.
Bannatyne AJ, Stapleton PB. Attitudes towards anorexia nervosa: volitional stigma differences in a sample of pre-clinical medicine and psychology students. J Ment Health Abingdon Engl 2017;26(5):442–8. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1149801

20.
Burket RC, Schramm LL. Therapists’ attitudes about treating patients with eating disorders. South Med J 1995; 88(8): 813–8. doi: 10.1097/00007611-199508000-00004

21.
Johns G, Taylor B, John A, Tan J. Current eating disorder healthcare services – the perspectives and experiences of individuals with eating disorders, their families and health professionals: systematic review and thematic synthesis. BJPsych Open 2019; 5(4): e59. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2019.48

22.
Smith AR, Forrest LN, Velkoff EA, Ribeiro JD, Franklin J. Implicit attitudes toward eating stimuli differentiate eating disorder and non-eating disorder groups and predict eating disorder behaviors. Int J Eat Disord 2018; 51(4): 343–51. doi: 10.1002/eat.22843

23.
Roefs A, Stapert D, Isabella LAS, Wolters G, Wojciechowski F, Jansen A. Early associations with food in anorexia nervosa patients and obese people assessed in the affective priming paradigm. Eat Behav 2005; 6(2): 151–63. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2004.10.001

24.
Paslakis G, Kühn S, Schaubschläger A, Schieber K, Röder K, Rauh E, et al. Explicit and implicit approach vs. avoidance tendencies towards high vs. low calorie food cues in patients with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls. Appetite 2016; 107: 171–9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.001

25.
Spring VL, Bulik CM. Implicit and explicit affect toward food and weight stimuli in anorexia nervosa. Eat Behav 2014; 15(1): 91–4. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.10.017

26.
Cowdrey FA, Finlayson G, Park RJ. Liking compared with wanting for high- and low-calorie foods in anorexia nervosa: aberrant food reward even after weight restoration. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 97(3): 463–70. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.046011

27.
Brown TA, Keel PK. What contributes to excessive diet soda intake in eating disorders: appetitive drive, weight concerns, or both? Eat Disord 2013; 21(3): 265–74. doi: 10.1080/10640266.2013.779190

28.
Schebendach JE, Mayer LE, Devlin MJ, Attia E, Contento IR, Wolf RL, et al. Food choice and diet variety in weight-restored patients with anorexia nervosa. J Am Diet Assoc 2011; 111(5): 732–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.02.002

29.
Forbush KT, Hunt TK. Characterization of eating patterns among individuals with eating disorders: what is the state of the plate? Physiol Behav 2014; 134: 92–109. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.02.045

30.
Whisenant SL, Smith BA. Eating disorders: current nutrition therapy and perceived needs in dietetics education and research. J Am Diet Assoc 1995; 95(10): 1109–12. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(95)00301-0

31.
Biddiscombe RJ, Scanlan JN, Ross J, Horsfield S, Aradas J, Hart S. Exploring the perceived usefulness of practical food groups in day treatment for individuals with eating disorders. Aust Occup Ther J 2018; 65(2): 98–106. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12442

32.
Morgan DL. Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1996.

33.
Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J 2008; 204(6): 291–5. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2008.192

34.
Esfandiari M, Papapanagiotou V, Diou C, Zandian M, Nolstam J, Södersten P, et al. Control of eating behavior using a novel feedback system. J Vis Exp JoVE 2018; May 8(135):57432. doi: 10.3791/57432

35.
Bergh C, Callmar M, Danemar S, Hölcke M, Isberg S, Leon M, et al. Effective treatment of eating disorders: results at multiple sites. Behav Neurosci 2013; 127(6): 878–89. doi: 10.1037/a0034921

36.
Zandian M, Holmstedt E, Larsson A, Bergh C, Brodin U, Södersten P. Anxiolytic effect of warmth in anorexia nervosa. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2017; 135(3): 266–7. doi: 10.1111/acps.12691

37.
Langlet B, Vestermark F, Stolt J, Zandian M, Södersten P, Bergh C. Physical activity and sleep during the first week of anorexia nervosa inpatient care. PLoS One 2021; 16(11): e0260077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260077

38.
Bergh C, Brodin U, Lindberg G, Södersten P. Randomized controlled trial of a treatment for anorexia and bulimia nervosa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99(14): 9486–91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.142284799

39.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

40.
Stott N, Fox JRE, Williams MO. Attentional bias in eating disorders: a meta-review. Int J Eat Disord 2021; 54(8): 1377–99. doi: 10.1002/eat.23560

41.
Bremner JD, Moazzami K, Wittbrodt MT, Nye JA, Lima BB, Gillespie CF, et al. Diet, stress and mental health. Nutrients 2020; 12(8): E2428. doi: 10.3390/nu12082428

42.
McKay N, Przybysz J, Cavanaugh A, Horvatits E, Giorgianni N, Czajka K. The effect of unhealthy food and liking on stress reactivity. Physiol Behav 2021; 229: 113216. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2020.113216

43.
Fock KM, Khoo J. Diet and exercise in management of obesity and overweight. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 28(S4): 59–63. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12407

44.
Nederkoorn C, Theiβen J, Tummers M, Roefs A. Taste the feeling or feel the tasting: tactile exposure to food texture promotes food acceptance. Appetite 2018; 120: 297–301. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.09.010

45.
Pellegrino R, Luckett CR. Aversive textures and their role in food rejection. J Texture Stud 2020; 51(5): 733–41. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12543

46.
Filiou RP, Lepore F, Bryant B, Lundström JN, Frasnelli J. Perception of trigeminal mixtures. Chem Senses 2015; 40(1): 61–9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bju064

47.
Melles H, Spix M, Jansen A. Avoidance in anorexia nervosa: towards a research agenda. Physiol Behav 2021; 238: 113478. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113478

48.
Livovsky DM, Pribic T, Azpiroz F. Food, eating, and the gastrointestinal tract. Nutrients 2020; 12(4): E986. doi: 10.3390/nu12040986

49.
Rowley J, Spence C. Does the visual composition of a dish influence the perception of portion size and hedonic preference? Appetite 2018; 128: 79–86. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.005

50.
Sulmont-Rossé C, Symoneaux R, Feyen V, Maitre I. Improving food sensory quality with and for elderly consumers. In Gastón A. and Paula V. Methods in consumer research, Vol. 2: alternative approaches and special applications. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing, 2018, pp. 355–72.

51.
Schebendach JE, Mayer LE, Devlin MJ, Attia E, Contento IR, Wolf RL, et al. Dietary energy density and diet variety as predictors of outcome in anorexia nervosa. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87(4): 810–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.4.810

52.
Tchanturia K, Davies H, Roberts M, Harrison A, Nakazato M, Schmidt U, et al. Poor cognitive flexibility in eating disorders: examining the evidence using the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task. PLoS One 2012; 7(1): e28331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028331

53.
McGraw AP, Larsen JT, Kahneman D, Schkade D. Comparing gains and losses. Psychol Sci 2010; 21(10): 1438–45. doi: 10.1177/0956797610381504