Transmission of food literacy to youth in Norwegian childcare institutions – a qualitative study

Marianne S. Morseth; Siyamali Gananathan; Sigrun Henjum; Laura Terragni

doi:10.29219/fnr.v68.9803

Marianne S. Morseth Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
Siyamali Gananathan Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
Sigrun Henjum Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0671-2688
Laura Terragni Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5313-7471

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v68.9803

Keywords: food, meals, residential care, adolescents, youth, obesity, non-communicable diseases

Abstract

Background: Youth in childcare institutions may have lower levels of food literacy compared to other youth. Food literacy, indicating the ability to plan and prepare meals from scratch, is associated with consuming healthier diets.

Objective: The objective of this study was to explore how food literacy is transmitted to youth through involvement and participation in food-related activities in Norwegian childcare institutions.

Design: Data were collected through qualitative semi-structured interviews with 13 staff and 8 adolescents (>16 years of age) selected by convenient sampling in childcare institutions (n = 6) in South-East Norway.

Results: We found that the institutional context provided both opportunities and limitations for transmitting food literacy. The staff tended to prefer a soft approach to transmitting food literacy due to the youth being perceived as vulnerable and a focus on youth autonomy. The youth showed ambivalent interests in participating in food-related activities and wished for their need to decide how much to be involved to be respected. A firm approach was perceived to increase the risk of conflict.

Discussion: Our findings are best interpreted in light of a childcare institution being at the intersect between the homely and public spheres. There was ambivalence among staff between following institutional guidelines and caring for the different needs of residents. Food was often referred to as symbolizing something else in the relationship between staff and youth, such as care, structure, autonomy, and a normal family life.

Conclusion: Initiatives aiming at including food literacy in care relations in childcare institutions are recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Sigrun Henjum, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

Professor

Laura Terragni, Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway

Professor

References

1.
Convention on the Rights of the Child. Treaty no. 27531. United Nations Treaty Series; 1989; vol.1577, pp. 3–178.

2.
Kupka R, Siekmans K, Beal T. The diets of children: overview of available data for children and adolescents. Glob Food Sec 2020; 27: 100442. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100442

3.
Popkin B, Adair L, Ng SW. The nutrition transition to a stage of high obesity and noncommunicable disease prevalence dominated by ultra-processed foods is not inevitable. Obes Rev 2022; 23: e13366. doi: 10.1111/obr.13366

4.
King L, Watson WLC, Chapman K, Kelly, B, Louie, JCY, Hughes C, et al. Do we provide meaningful guidance for healthful eating? An investigation into consumers’ interpretation of frequency consumption terms. J Nutr Educ Behav 2012; 44: 459–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2011.12.004

5.
Escott-Stump SA. Our nutrition literacy challenge: making the 2010 dietary guidelines relevant for consumers. J Am Dietetic Assoc 2011; 111(7): 979. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2011.05.024

6.
Fox EL, Timmer A. Children’s and adolescents’ characteristics and interactions with the food system. Global Food Sec. 2020; 27: 100419. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100419

7.
Hemar-Nicolas V, Ezan P, Gollety M, Guichard N, Leroy J. How do children learn eating practices? Beyond the nutritional information, the importance of social eating. Young Consum Insight Ideas Respons Marketers 2013; 14(1): 5–18. doi: 10.1108/17473611311305458

8.
Colatruglio S, Slater J. Challenges to acquiring and utilizing food literacy: perceptions of young Canadian adults. Can Food Stud/La Revue Canadienne Des études Sur l’alimentation 2016; 3: 96–118. doi: 10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.72

9.
Engler-Stringer R. Food, cooking skills, and health: a literature review. Can J Diet Pract Res 2010; 71: 141–5. doi: 10.3148/71.3.2010.141

10.
Vidgen HA, Gallegos D. Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite 2014; 76: 50–9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.01.010

11.
Azevedo Perry E, Thomas H, Samra HR, Edmonstone S, Davidson L, Faulkner A, et al. Identifying attributes of food literacy: a scoping review. Public Health Nutr 2017; 20(13): 2406–15. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001276

12.
Slater J, Falkenberg T, Rutherford J, Colatruglio S. Food literacy competencies: a conceptual framework for youth transitioning to adulthood. Int J Consum Stud 2018; 42(5): 547–56. doi: 10.1111/ijcs.12471

13.
Vaitkeviciute R, Ball LE, Harris N. The relationship between food literacy and dietary intake in adolescents: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2014; 18: 649–58. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000962

14.
Larson N, Laska MN, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M. Does involvement in food preparation track from adolescence to young adulthood and is it associated with better dietary quality? Findings from a 10-year longitudinal study. Public Health Nutr 2012; 15: 1150–8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011003004

15.
Desjardains E. Making something out of nothing. Food literacy among youth, pregnant women and young parents who are at risk for poor health. Ontario: Public health Ontario; 2013.

16.
Backe-Hansen ELM, Neumann CB, Storø J. God omsorg i barnevernsinstitusjoner. Oslo: Oslo and Akershus University College: NOVA; 2017.

17.
Norwegian Directorate for Children Youth and Family Affairs (BUFDIR). Barnevernsinstitusjoner (Childcare institutions) 2020. Available from: https://www.bufdir.no/barnevern/institusjoner/ [cited 15 June 2023].

18.
Ministry of Children and Families (Barne- og familiedepartementet). Lov om barnevern (barnevernsloven) og lov om endringer i barnevernloven. Oslo: Barne- og familiedepartementet; 2020.

19.
Statistical bureau of Norway (SSB). Oslo. Available from: https://www.ssb.no/statbank/table/11600/2023

20.
Helsedirektoratet. Kostrådene. Oslo: Directorate of Health; 2016.

21.
Helsedirektoratet. Kosthåndboken: Veileder i ernæringsarbeid i helse- og omsorgstjenesten. Oslo: Directorate of Health; 2016.

22.
Nysaether T, Vik C, Terragni L, Pettersen KS. Beskrivelser av måltidsstruktur og måltidstilbud overfor undgom i barnevernsinstitusjoner i Norge. Norsk tidsskrift for ernæring 2017; 3.

23.
Punch S, Dorrer N, Emond R, McIntosh I. Food practices in residential children’s homes: the views and experiences of staff and children. Sterling: University of Sterling; 2009.

24.
Dorrer N, McIntosh I, Punch S, Emond R. Children and food practices in residential care: ambivalence in the ‘institutional’ home. Children’s Geogr 2010; 8(3): 247–59. doi: 10.1080/14733285.2010.494863

25.
Bassett R, Chapman GE, Beagan BL. Autonomy and control: the co-construction of adolescent food choice. Appetite 2008; 50: 325–32. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2007.08.009

26.
Bowling A. Research methods in health – investigating health and health services. 4th ed. Berkshire, England: Open University Press; 2014.

27.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

28.
Bugge AB, Almås, R. Domestic dinner. J Consum Cult 2016; 6(2): 203–28. doi: 10.1177/1469540506064744

29.
Fairbrother H, Ellis, K. Everyday family food practices. In: Punch SVR, Skelton T, eds. Families, intergenerationality and peer group relations geographies of children and young people. Singapore: Springer; 2016, pp. 1–20.

30.
Emond R, McIntosh I, Punch S. Food and feelings in residential childcare. Br J Soc Work 2014; 44(7): 1840–56. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct009

31.
Le Moal F, Michaud M, Hartwick-Pflaum CA, Middleton G, Mallon I, Coveney J. Beyond the normative family meal promotion: a narrative review of qualitative results about ordinary domestic commensality. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18(6): 3186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063186

32.
Kayed NS, Jozefiak T, Rimehaug T, Tjeleflaat T, Brubakk A-M, Wichstrøm L. Resultater fra forskningsprosjektet Psykisk helse hos barn og unge i barnevernsinstitusjoner. Trondheim: Norges Teknisk Naturvitenskapelige Universitet (NTNU); 2015.

33.
Hadfield SP, Pierce M. Obesity in looked after children: is foster care protective from the dangers of obesity? Child Care Health Dev 2008; 34(6): 710–2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00874.x

34.
Skouteris H, McCabe M, Fuller-Tyszkiewicz M, Henwood A, Limbrick S, Miller R. Obesity in children in out-of-home care: a review of the literature. Aust Soc Work 2011; 64(4): 475–86. doi: 10.1080/0312407X.2011.574145

35.
Folkehelseinstituttet. Barn og unges medvirkning i barnevernet. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2020.

36.
Ziegler AM, Kasprzak CM, Mansouri TH, Gregory AM, 2nd, Barich RA, Hatzinger LA, et al. An ecological perspective of food choice and eating autonomy among adolescents. Front Psychol 2021; 12: 654139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654139

37.
Anthrologica U, World Food Programme (WFP). Bridging the gap: engaging adolescents for nutrition, health and sustainable development. Rome: World Food Programme; 2018.

38.
Slater J, Colatruglio S. Challenges to acquiring and utilizing food literacy: Perceptions of young Canadian adults. Can Food Stud/La Revue canadienne des études sur l’alimentation 2016; 3(1): 96–118. doi: 10.15353/cfs-rcea.v3i1.72

39.
Kommunenes sentralforbund (KS). Statistikk om barneverntjenesten. 2022. Available from: https://www.ks.no/fagomrader/statistikk-og-analyse/sysselsettingsstatistikk/statistikk-om-barnevernstjenesten/ [cited 12 June 2023].

40.
Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods. 2019; 18: 1609406919874596. doi: 10.1177/1609406919874596