Inclusion of macroalgae in the diet – a comparative survey from Norway, Chile and China

  • Franz Goecke Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
  • Inger Aakre Department of Seafood and Nutrition, Institute of Marine Research, Bergen, Norway
  • Lisse Angarita Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Andres Bello, Sede Concepción, Concepción, Chile
  • Na Li Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, P.R. China
  • Xiaodong Li Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, P.R. China https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-7639
  • María Cristina Escobar Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Andres Bello, Sede Concepción, Concepción, Chile
  • Silvana Cisternas Escuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Andres Bello, Sede Concepción, Concepción, Chile
  • Lianzhu Wang Yellow Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Qingdao, P.R. China
  • Shaojun Pang Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, P.R. China
  • Åshild Ergon Department of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
Keywords: seaweed, nutrition, seafood, iodine, food risks, culinary traditions

Abstract

Background: Macroalgae have been an important dietary component in many parts of the world for centuries, especially in Eastern Asia. In recent years, a combination of factors has contributed to enhance the use of macroalgae as food in the global market. Since macroalgae as a commercially available food are new in many countries, only a handful of studies have investigated their use and consumption.

Objective: In this tri-continental survey, we included three distant countries, each known for macroalgae producers with a long coast: Chile, China, and Norway. Our objective was to compare current uses of macroalgae as food, in a convenient sample dominated by male and female adult students.

Design: A macroalgae-specific food frequency questionnaire with a 4-week recall period was used to assess intake frequencies, species, and product types among a convenient sample of Norwegian, Chinese, and Chilean students.

Results: A total of 585 respondents who answered the survey considered macroalgae as appealing foods due to their flavor (23–67%) and nutritional benefits (49–90%). This study reported lack of awareness about potential food safety issues in this group. In the samples from Chile and China, tradition was important in terms of consumption of macroalgae, while food novelty seemed to be a major factor in the Norwegian group. However, all three countries consumed a similar number of species (17–19) and products containing macroalgae (17–18). Chinese respondents especially stood out for their frequency of consuming different products containing algae.

Discussion and conclusion: A variety of species were found the diet in all the population groups, either in pure form or as an ingredient in a variety of products. Further research on macroalgae intake in Norway, including amounts consumed, would be useful to develop food regulations and, furthermore, recommendations that are commonly known to consumers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


1.
Delaney A, Frangoudes K, Li S-A. Society and seaweed: understanding the past and present. In: Fleurence J, Levine I, eds. Seaweed in health and disease prevention. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2016, pp. 7–40.


2.
Mouritsen OG, Rhatigan P, Pérez-Lloréns JL. The rise of seaweed gastronomy: phycogastronomy. Botanica Marina 2019; 62(3): 195–209. doi: 10.1515/bot-2018-0041


3.
Schwimmer M, Schwimmer D. The role of algae and plankton in medicine. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton; 1955, p. 85.


4.
Cherry P, O’Hara C, Magee PJ, McSorley EM, Allsopp PJ. Risks and benefits of consuming edible seaweeds. Nutr Rev 2019; 77(5): 307–29. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuy066


5.
Steinsvik M. Tang og tare som vitaminkilde: Botemiddel mot mangelsykdommer hos mennesker, husdyr og kulturplanter. Oslo; 1944, p. 21. (in Norwegian) Nordstrandshøgda : Eget forlag.


6.
Montecino S. Consumo de algas y peces. Símbolos y marcas de identidad: Antropología de la alimentación en Chile. In: Figueroa E, ed. Biodiversidad marina: Valoración, usos y perspectivas. ¿Hacia dónde va Chile? Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de Chile; 2005. (in Spanish)


7.
Mithril C, Dragsted LO, Meyer C, Blauert E, Holt MK, Astrup A. Guidelines for the New Nordic Diet. Public Health Nutr. 2012; 15(10): 1941–1947. doi: 10.1017/S136898001100351X


8.
Pérez-Lloréns JL. El consumo histórico de algas en Europa, especialmente en tiempos de escasez. The Foodie Studies Magazine 2020; 5. (in Spanish)


9.
Mouritsen OG, Rhatigan P, Cornish ML, Critchley AT, Pérez-Lloréns JL. Saved by seaweeds: phyconomic contributions in times of crises. J Appl Phycol. 2021; 33(1): 443–458. doi: 10.1007/s10811-020-02256-4


10.
Teas J, Baldeón ME, Chiriboga DE, Davis JR, Sarriés AJ, Braverman LE. Could dietary seaweed reverse the metabolic syndrome? Asia Pacific J Clin Nutr 2009; 18: 2.


11.
Holdt SL, Kraan S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: functional food applications and legislation. J Appl Phycol. 2011; 23: 543–97. doi: 10.1007/s10811-010-9632-5


12.
Brown EM, Allsopp PJ, Magee PJ, Gill CI, Nitecki S, Strain CR, et al. Seaweed and human health. Nutr Rev. 2014; 72: 3. doi: 10.1111/nure.12091


13.
Astorga MS, Mansilla A, Ojeda J, Marambio J, Rosenfeld S, Mendez F, et al. Nutritional properties of dishes prepared with sub-Antarctic macroalgae – an opportunity for healthy eating. J Appl Phycol 2017; 29: 5. doi: 10.1007/s10811-017-1131-5


14.
Monteiro MS, Sloth J, Holdt S, Hansen M. Analysis and risk assessment of seaweed. EFSA J. 2019; 17: e170915. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.e170915


15.
Bouga M, Combet E. Emergence of seaweed and seaweed-containing foods in the UK: focus on labeling, iodine content, toxicity and nutrition. Foods 2015; 4(2): 240–53. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods4020240


16.
Aakre I, Doblaug Solli D, Wik Markhus M, Mæhre HK, Dahl L, Henjum S, et al. Commercially available kelp and seaweed products – valuable iodine source or risk of excess intake? Food Nutr Res 2021; 65: 7584. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7584


17.
MacArtain P, Gill CIR, Brooks M, Campbell R, Rowland IR. Nutritional value of edible seaweeds. Nutr Rev 2007; 65: 12. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00278.x


18.
Rioux L-E, Beaulieu L, Turgeon SL. Seaweeds: a traditional ingredients for new gastronomic sensation. Food Hydrocolloids 2017; 68: 255–65. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.02.005


19.
Palmieri N, Forleo MB. The potential of edible seaweed within the western diet. A segmentation of Italian consumers. Int J Gastronomy Food Sci 2020; 20: 100202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100202


20.
Ficheux A-S, Pierre O, Garrec R, Le Roudot A-C. Seaweed consumption in France: key data for exposure and risk assessment. Food Chem Toxicol 2022; 159: 112757. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112757


21.
Merkel A, Säwe F, Fredriksson C. The seaweed experience: Exploring the potential and value of a marine resource. Scand J Hosp Tourism 2021; 21(4): 391–406. doi: 10.1080/15022250.2021.1879671


22.
Buschmann AH, Camus C, Infante J, Neori A, Israel Á, Hernández-González MC, et al. Seaweed production: overview of the global state of exploitation, farming and emerging research activity. Eur J Phycol 2017; 52(4): 391–406. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2017.1365175


23.
Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, Klinger DH, et al. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature 2021; 591: 551–63. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6


24.
FAO & WHO. Report of the expert meeting on food safety for seaweed – current status and future perspectives. Rome, 28–29 October 2021. Food Safety and Quality Series No. 13. Rome.


25.
Wells ML, Potin P, Craigie JS, Raven JA, Merchant SS, Helliwell KE, et al. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: revisiting our understanding. J Appl Phycol 2017; 29(2): 949–82. doi: 10.1007/s10811-016-0974-5


26.
Hogstad S, Cederberg DL, Eriksen H, Kollander B, Ólafsson G, Mikkelsen B. A Nordic approach to food safety risk management of seaweed for use as food. Current status and basis for future work. Nordic Council of Ministers; 2022, p. 68.


27.
Banach JL, Hoek-van den Hil EF, van der Fels-Klerx HJ. Food safety hazards in the European seaweed chain. Comprehen Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2020; 19(2): 332–64. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12523


28.
Goecke F, Aránguiz-Acuña A, Palacios M, Muñoz-Muga P, Rucki M, Vítová M. Latitudinal distribution of lanthanides contained in macroalgae in Chile: an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometric (ICP-MS) determination. J Appl Phycol 2017; 29: 2117–128. doi: 10.1007/s10811-017-1106-6


29.
Cohen N, Arieli T. Field research in conflict environments: methodological challenges and snowball sampling. J Peace Res 2011; 48(4): 423–35. doi: 10.1177/0022343311405698


30.
Zava TT, Zava DT. Assessment of Japanese iodine intake based on seaweed consumption in Japan: a literature-based analysis. Thyroid Res 2011; 4: 14. doi: 10.1186/1756-6614-4-14


31.
Wendin K, Undeland I. Seaweed as food – Attitudes and preferences among Swedish consumers. A pilot study. Int J Gastronomy Food Sci 2020; 22: 100265. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100265


32.
Govaerts F, Olsen S.O. Exploration of seaweed consumption in Norway using the norm activation model: the moderator role of food innovativeness. Food Qual Prefer 2022; 99: 104511. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104511


33.
Losada-Lopez C, Calvo Dopico D, Faína-Medín JA. Neophobia and seaweed consumption: effects on consumer attitude and willingness to consume seaweed. Int J Gastronomy Food Sci 2021; 24: 100338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100338


34.
Montecino S. Consumo de algas y peces. Símbolos y marcas de identidad: Antropología de la alimentación en Chile. In Figueroa E, ed. Biodiversidad marina: Valoración, usos y perspectivas. ¿Hacia dónde va Chile? Editorial Universitaria, Santiago de Chile; 2005. (in Spanish)


35.
Directorate of Fisheries. Economic and biological figures from Norwegian fisheries. Bergen: Directorate of Fisheries; 2020, p. 40.


36.
Redway ML, Combet E. Seaweed as food: survey of the UK market and appraisal of opportunities and risks in the context of iodine nutrition. Br Food J 2023; 125(10): 3601–622. doi: 10.1108/BFJ-01-2023-0024


37.
Laurel S. Consumer acceptability of Gulf of Maine sugar kelp seaweed in baked bread. Electronic Theses and Dissertations. University of Maine; 2020, p. 159.


38.
Løvdal T, Lunestad BT, Myrmel M, Rosnes JT, Skipnes D. Microbiological food safety of seaweeds. Foods 2021; 10: 2719. doi: 10.3390/foods10112719


39.
European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Dujardin B, Ferreira de Sousa R, Gómez Ruiz JA. Scientific Report on the dietary exposure to heavy metals and iodine intake via consumption of seaweeds and halophytes in the European population. EFSA J 2023; 21(1): 47. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7798


40.
Norwegian Food Safety Authority (NFSA). Mattilsynet web page. Available from: https://www.mattilsynet.no/mat-og-drikke/forbrukere/er-det-trygt-a-spise-tang-og-tare [cited 10 January 2024].


41.
Zhang D, Luo C-Y, Zhong M-Y, Hu Z-M, Zhang Q-S. Efficient methods of seedling culture and cultivation of the economic macroalga Scytosiphon lomentaria (Phaeophyta): a systematic review. Aquaculture 2023; 567: 739253. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2023.739253


42.
Murai U, Yamagishi K, Kishida R, Iso H. Impact of seaweed intake on health. Eur J Clin Nutr 2021; 75: 877–89. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00739-8


43.
Chen Q, Pan X-D, Huang B-F, Han J-L. Distribution of metals and metalloids in dried seaweeds and health risk to population in southeastern China. Sci Rep 2018; 8: 3578. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-21732-z
Published
2025-06-26
How to Cite
Goecke , F., Aakre , I., Angarita , L., Li , N., Li , X., Escobar , M. C., Cisternas , S., Wang , L., Pang , S., & Ergon , Åshild. (2025). Inclusion of macroalgae in the diet – a comparative survey from Norway, Chile and China. Food & Nutrition Research, 69. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v69.10856
Section
Original Articles