Attitudes towards and experiences with sourdough and baker’s yeast bread amongst participants in a randomised controlled trial: a qualitative study

  • Lisa Garnweidner-Holme Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
  • Marit Hallquist Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
  • Solveig Ivara Watters Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
  • Mia Gjøvik Oslo Metropolitan University
  • Marius Pihl Fredriksen Mesterbakeren AS, Oslo, Norway
  • Stephanie Jonassen Mesterbakeren AS, Oslo, Norway
  • Ina Ravnanger Mesterbakeren AS, Oslo, Norway
  • Christine Henriksen Department of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Basic Medical Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Mari C.W. Myhrstad Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
  • Vibeke H. Telle-Hansen Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v66.8839
Keywords: sourdough bread, yeast bread, gastrointestinal symptoms, experiences, qualitative study

Abstract

Background: Bread is an important source of dietary fibre. However, an increasing number of individuals exclude bread from their habitual diet for various reasons. In recent years, sourdough bread has increased in popularity, and clinical studies have indicated that sourdough bread may decrease gastrointestinal symptoms.

Objective: To investigate attitudes towards and experiences with sourdough and baker’s yeast bread amongst participants in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), the health effects and consumer aspects of bread (HELFAB) study.

Design: We conducted individual interviews with 10 participants who stated to be sceptical about bread and who participated in an RCT to investigate the health effects of sourdough bread versus baker’s yeast bread. The participants were interviewed on two occasions (before and after the RCT). Interviews were conducted digitally between September and December 2020 and were thematically analysed.

Results: Half of the interviewed participants experienced gastrointestinal symptoms, such as pain in the stomach, when they consumed bread prior to the RCT. They often preferred sourdough bread to baker’s yeast bread both before and after the study, since they found that sourdough bread was easier to digest. Participants who were sceptical about bread prior to the study became more positive about bread because of their experiences with the intervention breads. This finding was mainly related to the taste and consistency of sourdough bread. The participants often associated bread with healthiness, mainly due to the dietary fibre content in bread.

Conclusions: Sourdough bread with increased dietary fibre may be an important source of dietary fibre for those who perceive gastrointestinal problems from baker’s yeast bread. Participants in this qualitative study stated to change their attitudes towards bread, mainly due to perceived healthiness of the intervention bread.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


1.
Wagenaar CA, van de Put M, Bisschops M, Walrabenstein W, de Jonge CS, Herrema H, et al. The effect of dietary interventions on chronic inflammatory diseases in relation to the microbiome: a systematic review. Nutrients 2021; 13(9): 3208. doi: 10.3390/nu13093208

2.
Tosh SM. Review of human studies investigating the post-prandial blood-glucose lowering ability of oat and barley food products. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67(4): 310–17. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.25

3.
Simões CD, Maganinho M, Sousa AS. FODMAPs, inflammatory bowel disease and gut microbiota: updated overview on the current evidence. Eur J Nutr 2022; 61(3): 1187–98. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02755-1

4.
Surdea-Blaga T, Cozma-Petrut A, Dumitraşcu DL. Dietary interventions and irritable bowel syndrome – what really works? Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2021; 37(2): 152–7. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000706

5.
Norwegian Directorate of Health. Developement in the Norwegian diet. 2021; Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway.

6.
D’Elia L, La Fata E, Giaquinto A, Strazzullo P, Galletti F. Effect of dietary salt restriction on central blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the intervention studies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2020; 22(5): 814–25. doi: 10.1111/jch.13852

7.
Stephen AM, Champ MM, Cloran SJ, Fleith M, van Lieshout L, Mejborn H, et al. Dietary fibre in Europe: current state of knowledge on definitions, sources, recommendations, intakes and relationships to health. Nutr Res Rev 2017; 30(2): 149–90. doi: 10.1017/S095442241700004X

8.
Freire R. Scientific evidence of diets for weight loss: different macronutrient composition, intermittent fasting, and popular diets. Nutrition 2020; 69: 110549. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2019.07.001

9.
Cox DN, Koster A, Russell CG. Predicting intentions to consume functional foods and supplements to offset memory loss using an adaptation of protection motivation theory. Appetite 2004; 43(1): 55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.02.003

10.
Russo F, Riezzo G, Orlando A, Linsalata M, D’Attoma B, Prospero L, et al. A comparison of the low-FODMAPs diet and a tritordeum-based diet on the gastrointestinal symptom profile of patients suffering from irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea variant (IBS-D): a randomized controlled trial. Nutrients 2022; 14(8): 1544. doi: 10.3390/nu14081544

11.
Arvola A, Lähteenmäki L, Dean M, Vassallo M, Winkelmann M, Claupein E, et al. Consumers’ beliefs about whole and refined grain products in the UK, Italy and Finland. J Cereal Sci 2007; 46(3): 197–206. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.001

12.
Gellynck X, Kühne B, Van Bockstaele F, Van de Walle D, Dewettinck K. Consumer perception of bread quality. Appetite 2009; 53(1): 16–23. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2009.04.002

13.
Sandvik P, Nydahl M, Kihlberg I, Marklinder I. Consumers’ health-related perceptions of bread – implications for labeling and health communication. Appetite 2018; 121: 285–93. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.092

14.
Sandvik P, Nydahl M, Marklinder I, Næs T, Kihlberg I. Different liking but similar healthiness perceptions of rye bread among younger and older consumers in Sweden. Food Qual Prefer 2017; 61: 26–37. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.04.016

15.
Dimidi E, Cox SR, Rossi M, Whelan K. Fermented foods: definitions and characteristics, impact on the gut microbiota and effects on gastrointestinal health and disease. Nutrients 2019; 11(8): 1806. doi: 10.3390/nu11081806

16.
Loponen J, Gänzle MG. Use of sourdough in low FODMAP baking. Foods 2018; 7(7): 96. doi: 10.3390/foods7070096

17.
Rizzello CG, Portincasa P, Montemurro M, Di Palo DM, Lorusso MP, De Angelis M, et al. Sourdough fermented breads are more digestible than those started with baker’s yeast alone: an in vivo challenge dissecting distinct gastrointestinal responses. Nutrients 2019; 11(12): 2954. doi: 10.3390/nu11122954

18.
Laatikainen R, Koskenpato J, Hongisto SM, Loponen J, Poussa T, Huang X, et al. Pilot study: comparison of sourdough wheat bread and yeast-fermented wheat bread in individuals with wheat sensitivity and irritable bowel syndrome. Nutrients 2017; 9(11): 1215. doi: 10.3390/nu9111215

19.
Raninen K, Lappi J, Kolehmainen M, Kolehmainen M, Mykkänen H, Poutanen K, et al. Diet-derived changes by sourdough-fermented rye bread in exhaled breath aspiration ion mobility spectrometry profiles in individuals with mild gastrointestinal symptoms. Int J Food Sci Nutr 2017; 68(8): 987–96. doi: 10.1080/09637486.2017.1312296

20.
Lewin S, Glenton C, Oxman AD. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. BMJ 2009; 339: b3496. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b3496

21.
Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3(2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

22.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19(6): 349–57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042

23.
Braun V, Clarke V. Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qual Res Sport Exerc Health 2019; 11(4): 589–97. doi: 10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

24.
Kostecka M, Kostecka-Jarecka J, Kowal M. The low-FODMAP diet as an effective tool for managing irritable bowel syndrome – an assessment of adult patients’ knowledge of dietary guidelines. Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig 2021; 72(4): 419–26. doi: 10.32394/rpzh.2021.0181

25.
Kaneko H, Tsuboi H, Yamamoto S, Konagaya T. Observational study on knowledge and eating habits with respect to low- and high-FODMAP foods in medical checkup populations in Japan. Nutrients 2019; 11(10): 2436. doi: 10.3390/nu11102436

26.
Sajdakowska M, Gębski J, Jeżewska-Zychowicz M, Królak M. Consumer choices in the bread market: the importance of fiber in consumer decisions. Nutrients 2020; 13(1): 132. doi: 10.3390/nu13010132

27.
Sajdakowska M, Gębski J, Żakowska-Biemans S, Jeżewska-Zychowicz M. Willingness to eat bread with health benefits: habits, taste and health in bread choice. Public Health 2019; 167: 78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.10.018

28.
Norwegian Directorate of Health. National dietary recommendations. 2016. [cited 2022 Sep 01]. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/faglige-rad/kostradene-og-naeringsstoffer

29.
Crouch M, McKenzie H. The logic of small samples in interview-based qualitative research. Soc Sci Inform 2006; 45(4): 483–99. doi: 10.1177/0539018406069584

30.
Archibald MM, Ambagtsheer RC, Casey MG, Lawless M. Using zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. Int J Qual Methods 2019; 18: 1609406919874596. doi: 10.1177/1609406919874596
Published
2022-10-21
How to Cite
Garnweidner-Holme L., Hallquist M., Watters S. I., Gjøvik M., Pihl Fredriksen M., Jonassen S., Ravnanger I., Henriksen C., Myhrstad M. C., & Telle-Hansen V. H. (2022). Attitudes towards and experiences with sourdough and baker’s yeast bread amongst participants in a randomised controlled trial: a qualitative study. Food & Nutrition Research, 66. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v66.8839
Issue
Vol 66 (2022)
Section
Original Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to SNF Swedish Nutrition Foundation. Read the full Copyright- and Licensing Statement.

 

 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)