Nutritional, biochemical and sensory properties of instant beverage powder made from two different varieties of pearl millet

  • Anthony O. Obilana Food Tehnology Department, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville Campus, Cape Town
  • Barthi Odhav Biotechnology and Food Technology Department, Durban University of Technology, Durban
  • Victoria A. Jideani Food Tehnology Department, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Bellville Campus, Cape Town
Keywords: Food Processing, Cereal grain foods and beverages, Pearl millet, Malting, Extrusion, digestibility


Introduction: The traditional method of producing instant foods involves producing a gelatinised paste from the preferred grain flour and proceeding to dry it using a drum drier. This produced a flaked product, which can be used as is or ground and sieved to obtain the desired particle size. With the advent of extrusion cooking technology and diverse production processes associated with the technology, food products including instant foods from cereals were developed.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to produce a nutritious and acceptable pearl millet instant beverage powder (PMIBP) using combination processing.

Methods: The effect of different processing methods (malting, extrusion, and a combination of both processes) on the nutritional, biochemical, and sensory characteristics of beverage powders and beverages made from two varieties of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) were evaluated.

Results: Combination processing led to a significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease in total fat and total dietary fibre (TDF) (3.85 and 22.99 g/100 g, respectively) of AgriGreen (AgG) extruded malted pearl millet (EMPM) and extruded raw pearl millet–malted pearl millet mix (ERPMMPM). Combination processing also led to a decrease in the ash, total fat, TDF, Fe and Zn content (1.76, 3.48, 14.26 g/100 g, 7.78 and 4.74 mg/100 g, respectively) of Babala (Ba) EMPM and Ba ERPMMPM (1.88, 4.22, 21.71 g/100 g, 7.24 and 4.14 mg/100 g, respectively). Beverages of 10% total solids were prepared from the samples and offered to an untrained consumer panel. The beverages were rated on appearance, colour, aroma, flavour, texture and overall acceptability on a nine-point hedonic scale. In general, Ba raw pearl millet was rated 4 (like slightly), AgG malted pearl millet was rated 6 (dislike slightly), and all other pearl millet samples from both varieties were rated 5 (neither like nor dislike).

Conclusion: Although combination processing led to an increase in carbohydrates, Ca, energy, Fe content, and 12 of the 15 amino acids measured as well as protein and starch digestibility and no change in the other nutrients measured, this did not significantly impact on the acceptability of the beverages.


Download data is not yet available.


  1. Leistner L. Combined methods for food preservation. In: Rahman MS, ed. Handbook of food preservation. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007, pp. 867–93. DOI: 10.1201/9781420017373

  2. AOAC. Official methods of analysis. 17th ed. Horwitz VW, ed. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists International. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; 2003.

  3. Benson JV, Patterson JA. Accelerated automatic chromatographic analysis of amino acids on spherical resin. Anal Chem 1965; 37: 1108–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2018.07.002

  4. Klapper DG. A new low-cost, fully automated amino acid analyser using a gradient HPLC. In: Elzinga M, ed. Methods in protein sequence analysis. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press; 1982, pp. 509–15.

  5. Perkin-Elmer. Plasma 400: users manual. Hamburg, Germany; 1996.

  6. Saunders RM, Connor MA, Booth AN, Bickoff EM, Kohler GO. Measurement of digestibility of Alfalfa protein concentrates by in vivo and in vitro methods. J Nutr 1973; 103: 530–5. DOI: 10.1093/jn/103.4.530

  7. Ali MAM, El Tinay AH, Abdalla AH. Effect of fermentation on the in vitro protein digestibility of pearl millet. Food Chem 2003; 80(1): 51–4. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00234-0

  8. Onyango C, Noetzold H, Bley T, Henle T. Proximate composition and digestibility of fermented and extruded uji from maize–finger millet blend. LWT. Food Sci Technol 2004; 37: 827–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2004.03.008

  9. Silvia MT, Miller EE, Pratt DE. Chia seeds as a source of natural lipid antioxidants. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1984; 61: 928–31. DOI: 10.1007/BF02542169

  10. Awika JM, Rooney LW, Wu X, Prior RL, Cisneros-Zevallos L. Screening methods to measure antioxidant activity of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and sorghum products. J Agric Food Chem 2003; 51(23): 6657–62. DOI: 10.1021/jf034790i

  11. Dobraszczyk BJ, Ainsworth P, Ibanoglu S, Bouchon P. Baking, extrusion and frying. In: Brennan JG, ed. Food processing handbook. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA; 2006, pp. 237–90.

  12. Bjork I, Asp N-G. The effects of extrusion cooking on nutritional value – a literature review. J Food Eng 1983; 2: 281–308. DOI: 10.1016/0260-8774(83)90016-X

  13. Fabriani G, Lintas C, Quaglia GB. Chemistry of lipids in processing and technology of pasta products. Cereal Chem 1968; 45: 454–63.

  14. Traoré T, Mouquet C, Icard-Vernière C, Traoré AS, Trèche S. Changes in nutrient composition, phytate and cyanide contents and α-amylase activity during cereal malting in small production units in Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso). Food Chem 2004; 88(1): 105–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.01.032

  15. Shayo NB, Nnko SAM, Gidamis AB, Dillon VM. Assessment of cyanogenic glucoside (cyanide) residues in Mbege: an opaque traditional Tanzanian beer. Int J Food Sci Nutr 1998; 49: 333–8. DOI: 10.3109/09637489809089407

  16. Opoku AR, Ohenhen SO, Ejiofor N. Nutrient composition of millet (Pennisetum typhoides) grains and malt. J Agric Food Chem 1981; 29: 1247–8. DOI: 10.1021/jf00108a036

  17. Chavan JK, Kadam SS. Nutritional improvement of cereals by sprouting. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1989; 28: 401–37. DOI: 10.1080/10408398909527508

  18. Elmaki HB, Babiker EE, ElTinay AH. Changes in chemical composition, grain malting, starch and tannin contents and protein digestibility during germination of sorghum cultivars. Food Chem 1999; 64: 331–6. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00118-6

  19. Abdalla AA, ElTinay AH, Mohamed BE, Abdalla AH. Effect of traditional processes on phytate and mineral content of pearl millet. Food Chem 1998; 63(1): 79–84. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00194-5

  20. Adeola O, Orban JI. Chemical composition and nutrient digestibility of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) fed to growing pigs. J Cereal Sci 1995; 22: 177–84. DOI: 10.1016/0733-5210(95)90048-9

  21. Malleshi NG, Klopfenstein CF. Nutrient composition, amino acid and vitamin contents of malted sorghum, pearl millet, finger millet and their rootlets. Int J Food Sci Nutr 1998; 49: 415–22. DOI: 10.3109/09637489809086420

  22. Suma PF, Urooj A. Nutrients, antinutrients & bioaccessible mineral content (in vitro) of pearl millet as influenced by milling. J Food Sci Technol 2014; 51(4): 756–61. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-011-0541-7

  23. Lorenz K. Cereal sprouts: composition, nutritive value, food application. CRC Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 1980; 13: 353–85. DOI: 10.1080/10408398009527295

  24. Elmalik M, Klopfenstein CF, Hoseney RC, Bates LS. Effects of germination on the nutritional quality of sorghum grain with contrasting kernel characteristics. Nutr Rep Int 1986; 34: 941–50.

  25. Rao PU, Deosthale YG. Tannin content of pulses: varietal differences and effects of germination and cooking. J Sci Food Agric 1982; 33: 1013–16. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2740331012

  26. El-Hady EAA, Habiba RAA. Effect of soaking and extrusion conditions on antinutrients and protein digestibility of legume seeds. LWT – Food Sci Technol 2003; 36(3): 285–93. DOI: 10.1016/S0023-6438(02)00217-7

  27. Alonso R, Orue E, Marzo F. Effects of extrusion and conventional processing methods on protein and antinutritional factor contents in pea seeds. Food Chem 1998; 63(4): 505–12. DOI: 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00037-5

  28. Bhise V, Chavan J, Kadam S. Effects of malting on proximate composition and in vitro protein and starch digestibilities of grain sorghum. J Food Sci Technol 1988; 25(6): 327–9.

  29. Phillips RD. Effect of extrusion cooking on the nutritional quality of plant proteins. In: Phillips RD, Finley JW, eds. Protein quality and the effect of processing. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1989, pp. 219–46.

  30. Pawar VS, Pawar VD. Malting characteristics and biochemical changes of foxtail millet. J Food Sci Technol 1997; 34: 416–18.

  31. Archana SS, Kawatra A. In vitro protein and starch digestibility of pearl millet (Pennisetum gluacum L.) as affected by processing techniques. Nahrung – Food 2001; 45(1): 25–7. DOI: 10.1002/1521-3803(20010101)45:1<25::AID-FOOD25>3.0.CO;2-W

  32. Holm, J., Asp, N.G. & Björck, I. Factors affecting enzymatic degradation of cereal starches in vitro and in vivo. In: Cereals in a European context (edited by MORTON, J.D.), 1987. Pp. 169–187. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

  33. Deshpande SS, Cheryan M. Effects of phytic acid, divalent cations and their interactions on α-amylase activity. J Food Sci. 1984;49:516–9.

  34. Thompson LV, Yoon JH. Starch digestibility as affected by polyphenols and phytic acid. J Food Sci. 1984;49:1228–9.

  35. Ali, MaM., Tinay, AHE., Mohamed, IA. & Babiker, EE. Supplementation and cooking of pearl millet: Changes in protein fractions and sensory quality. World Journal of Dairy & Food Sciences. 2009;4:41–45.

  36. Obilana AO., Odhav, B., Jideani, VA. Functional and Physical Properties of Instant Beverage Powder Made From Two Different Varieties of Pearl Millet. Journal of Food and Nutrition Research. 2.2014;5:250-257. DOI: 10.12691/jfnr-2-5-7

  37. Farhangi M, Valadon LRG. Effect of acidified processing and storage on carotenoids (Pro vitamin A) and vitamin C in moongbean sprouts. J Food Sci 1981; 46: 1464. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb04199.x

  38. Osuntogun BA, Adewusi SRA, Ogundiwin JO, Nwasike CC. Effect of cultivar, steeping, and malting on tannin, total polyphenol, and cyanide content of Nigerian sorghum. Cereal Chem 1989; 66: 87–9.

How to Cite
Obilana A. O., Odhav B., & Jideani V. A. (2018). Nutritional, biochemical and sensory properties of instant beverage powder made from two different varieties of pearl millet. Food & Nutrition Research, 62.
Original Articles