Associations between parental food choice motives, health-promoting feeding practices, and infants’ fruit and vegetable intakes: the Food4toddlers study

  • Margrethe Røed Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Agder, Norway
  • Frøydis Nordgård Vik Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Agder, Norway
  • Elisabet Rudjord Hillesund Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Agder, Norway
  • Wendy Van Lippevelde Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Agder, Norway; and Department of Marketing, Innovation and Organisation, Faculty of Economics & Business administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
  • Nina Cecilie Øverby Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Agder, Norway
Keywords: child, healthy food intake, mediation, diet

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the associations between parental food choice motives and infants’ fruit and vegetable intakes and to examine whether parental feeding practices mediated these associations.

Design: A total of 298 parents participated in the Norwegian Food4toddlers study. Before the child’s first birthday (mean age = 10.9 months), the parents completed an online baseline questionnaire. Five parental food choice motives were assessed: health, convenience, sensory appeal, price, and familiarity. Infants’ fruit and vegetable intakes and three health-promoting feeding practices were also assessed. For each food choice motive and its relation to fruit or vegetable intake, three single mediation models were conducted. Mediation effects were examined using MacKinnon’s product of coefficients procedure, and bootstrap confidence intervals (CIs) were used for inferential testing.

Results: Higher scores on the motive of health were positively associated with infants’ vegetable intake (τ = 0.394, P < 0.001). No other significant associations were found between food choice motives and fruit or vegetable intake. The feeding practice of shaping a healthy environment mediated the relationships between health motive and both fruit (αβ = 0.067, CI: 0.001–0.146) and vegetable (αβ = 0.105, CI: 0.042–0.186) intakes. The feeding practice of encouraging balance and variety mediated the relationships between health motive and vegetable (αβ = 0.085, CI: 0.030–0.150) intake and between sensory appeal motive and vegetable intake (αβ = 0.047, CI: 0.005–0.103).

Conclusion: High levels of parental health motive are associated with higher infant vegetable intake. Our study contributes to understand the structure of parental feeding behaviors that may have implication for nutrition interventions targeting parents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


  1. Lobstein T, Jackson-Leach R, Moodie ML, Hall KD, Gortmaker SL, Swinburn BA, et al. Child and adolescent obesity: part of a bigger picture. Lancet 2015; 385: 2510–20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61746-3

  2. Grimm KA, Kim SA, Yaroch AL, Scanlon KS. Fruit and vegetable intake during infancy and early childhood. Pediatrics 2014; 134: S63–9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0646K

  3. Gugusheff JR, Ong ZY, Muhlhausler BS. The early origins of food preferences: targeting the critical windows of development. FASEB J 2015; 29: 365–73. doi: 10.1096/fj.14-255976

  4. Rose CM, Birch LL, Savage JS. Dietary patterns in infancy are associated with child diet and weight outcomes at 6 years. Int J Obes 2017; 41: 783–8. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.27

  5. Bjelland M, Brantsæter AL, Haugen M, Meltzer HM, Nystad W, Andersen LF. Changes and tracking of fruit, vegetables and sugar-sweetened beverages intake from 18 months to 7 years in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 793. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-793

  6. Buscot M-J, Thomson RJ, Juonala M, Sabin MA, Burgner DP, Lehtimäki T, et al. BMI trajectories associated with resolution of elevated youth BMI and incident adult obesity. Pediatrics 2018; 141: e20172003. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2003

  7. Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K, McKee M. Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med 2006; 42: 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.11.012

  8. World Health Organization. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption to reduce the risk of noncommunicable diseases 2014. [cited 25 September 2020] Available from: https://www.who.int/elena/titles/bbc/fruit_vegetables_ncds/en/.

  9. Woodside JV, Young IS, McKinley MC. Fruits and vegetables: measuring intake and encouraging increased consumption. Proc Nutr Soc 2013; 72: 236–45. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112003059

  10. Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, Fadnes LT, Keum N, Norat T, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality – a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol 2017; 46: 1029–56. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw319

  11. Craig LC, McNeill G, Macdiarmid JI, Masson LF, Holmes BA. Dietary patterns of school-age children in Scotland: association with socio-economic indicators, physical activity and obesity. Br J Nutr 2010; 103: 319–34. doi: 10.1017/S0007114509991942

  12. Duncanson K, Lee YQ, Burrows T, Collins C. Utility of a brief index to measure diet quality of Australian preschoolers in the feeding healthy food to kids randomised controlled trial. Nutr Diet 2017; 74: 158–66. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12295

  13. Ahern SM, Caton SJ, Bouhlal S, Hausner H, Olsen A, Nicklaus S, et al. Eating a rainbow. Introducing vegetables in the first years of life in 3 European countries. Appetite 2013; 71: 48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.005

  14. Øverby N, Kristiansen A, Andersen L, Lande B. Spedkost 12 months. National dietary survey among 12 month old children. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Health; 2009.

  15. DeCosta P, Møller P, Frøst MB, Olsen A. Changing children’s eating behaviour – a review of experimental research. Appetite 2017: 327–57. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.004

  16. Jones LR, Steer CD, Rogers IS, Emmett PM. Influences on child fruit and vegetable intake: sociodemographic, parental and child factors in a longitudinal cohort study. Public Health Nutr 2010; 13: 1122–30. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010000133

  17. Lacy KE, Spence AC, McNaughton SA, Crawford DA, Wyse RJ, Wolfenden L, et al. Home environment predictors of vegetable and fruit intakes among Australian children aged 18 months. Appetite 2019; 139: 95–104. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.04.009

  18. Rodgers RF, Paxton SJ, Massey R, Campbell KJ, Wertheim EH, Skouteris H, et al. Maternal feeding practices predict weight gain and obesogenic eating behaviors in young children: a prospective study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2013; 10: 24. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-24

  19. Vaughn AE, Ward DS, Fisher JO, Faith MS, Hughes SO, Kremers SP, et al. Fundamental constructs in food parenting practices: a content map to guide future research. Nutr Rev 2016; 74: 98–117. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv061

  20. Haszard JJ, Russell CG, Byrne RA, Taylor RW, Campbell KJ. Early maternal feeding practices: associations with overweight later in childhood. Appetite 2019; 132: 91–6. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.10.008

  21. Kiefner-Burmeister AE, Hoffmann DA, Meers MR, Koball AM, Musher-Eizenman D. Food consumption by young children: a function of parental feeding goals and practices. Appetite 2014; 74: 6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.11.011

  22. Russell CG, Worsley A, Liem DG. Parents’ food choice motives and their associations with children’s food preferences. Public Health Nutr 2015; 18: 1018–27. doi: 10.1017/S1368980014001128

  23. Larsen JK, Hermans RC, Sleddens EF, Vink J, Kremers S, Ruiter E, et al. How to bridge the intention-behavior gap in food parenting: automatic constructs and underlying techniques. Appetite 2018; 123: 191–200. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.016

  24. Hoffmann DA, Marx JM, Kiefner-Burmeister A, Musher-Eizenman D. Influence of maternal feeding goals and practices on children’s eating behaviors. Appetite 2016; 107: 21–7. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.07.014

  25. Røed M, Hillesund ER, Vik FN, Van Lippevelde W, Øverby NC. The Food4toddlers study-study protocol for a web-based intervention to promote healthy diets for toddlers: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2019; 19: 563. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6915-x

  26. Ipsos. Ipsos SoMe-tracker Q3’19 2019. [cited 25 September 2020] Available from: https://www.ipsos.com/nb-no/ipsos-some-tracker-q319.

  27. Steptoe A, Pollard TM, Wardle J. Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the Food Choice Questionnaire. Appetite 1995; 25: 267–84. doi: 10.1006/appe.1995.0061

  28. Cunha LM, Cabral D, Moura AP, de Almeida MDV. Application of the Food Choice Questionnaire across cultures: systematic review of cross-cultural and single country studies. Food Qual Prefer 2018; 64: 21–36. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.10.007

  29. Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A, Vassallo M, Pagiaslis A. Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) revisited. Suggestions for the development of an enhanced general food motivation model. Appetite 2009; 52: 199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2008.09.014

  30. Pollard J, Greenwood D, Kirk S, Cade J, Pollard J, Greenwood D, et al. Motivations for fruit and vegetable consumption in the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr 2002; 5: 479–86. doi: 10.1079/PHN2001311

  31. Andersen L, Lande B, Arsky G, Trygg K. Validation of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire used among 12-month-old Norwegian infants. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003; 57: 881–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601621

  32. Campbell KJ, Crawford DA, Ball K. Family food environment and dietary behaviors likely to promote fatness in 5–6 year-old children. Int J Obes 2006; 30: 1272. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803266

  33. Harrison K, Liechty JM, The STRONG Kids Program. US preschoolers’ media exposure and dietary habits: the primacy of television and the limits of parental mediation. J Child Media 2012; 6: 18–36. doi: 10.1080/17482798.2011.633402

  34. Lanfer A, Hebestreit A, Ahrens W, Krogh V, Sieri S, Lissner L, et al. Reproducibility of food consumption frequencies derived from the Children’s Eating Habits Questionnaire used in the IDEFICS study. Int J Obes 2011; 35: S61. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.36

  35. Musher-Eizenman D, Holub S. Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire: validation of a new measure of parental feeding practices. J Pediatr Psychol 2007; 32: 960–72. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm037

  36. Russell CG, Haszard JJ, Taylor RW, Heath A-LM, Taylor B, Campbell KJ. Parental feeding practices associated with children’s eating and weight: what are parents of toddlers and preschool children doing? Appetite. 2018: 128–8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.05.145

  37. Haszard JJ, Williams SM, Dawson AM, Skidmore PM, Taylor RW. Factor analysis of the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire in a large sample of children. Appetite 2013; 62: 110–8. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2012.11.017

  38. Saltzman JA, Balantekin KN, Musaad S, Bost KK, Fiese BH. Longitudinal factor analysis of the Comprehensive Feeding Practices Questionnaire among parents of preschool-aged children. Appetite 2018; 129: 94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.07.006

  39. Melbye EL, Øgaard T, Øverby NC. Validation of the comprehensive feeding practices questionnaire with parents of 10-to-12-year-olds. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 113. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-113

  40. MacKinnon DP. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2008.

  41. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Methods 2008; 40: 879–91. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879

  42. Hayes AF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis : a regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2018.

  43. Wen Z, Fan X. Monotonicity of effect sizes: questioning kappa-squared as mediation effect size measure. Psychol Methods 2015; 20: 193. doi: 10.1037/met0000040

  44. O’Rourke HP, MacKinnon DP. Reasons for testing mediation in the absence of an intervention effect: a research imperative in prevention and intervention research. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2018; 79: 171–81. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.171

  45. Oellingrath IM, Hersleth M, Svendsen MV. Association between parental motives for food choice and eating patterns of 12-to 13-year-old Norwegian children. Public Health Nutr 2013; 16: 2023–31. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012004430

  46. Roos E, Lehto R, Ray C. Parental family food choice motives and children’s food intake. Food Qual Prefer 2012; 24: 85–91. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.09.006

  47. Yee AZ, Lwin MO, Ho SS. The influence of parental practices on child promotive and preventive food consumption behaviors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017; 14: 47. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0501-3

  48. Pearson N, Biddle SJ, Gorely T. Family correlates of fruit and vegetable consumption in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 2009; 12: 276–83. doi: 10.1017/s1368980008002589

  49. Blaine RE, Kachurak A, Davison KK, Klabunde R, Fisher JO,. Food parenting and child snacking: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2017; 14: 146. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0593-9

  50. Melbye EL, Øverby NC, Øgaard T. Child consumption of fruit and vegetables: the roles of child cognitions and parental feeding practices. Public Health Nutr 2012; 15: 1047–55. doi: 10.1017/S1368980011002679

  51. Corsini N, Kettler L, Danthiir V, Wilson C. Parental feeding practices to manage snack food intake: associations with energy intake regulation in young children. Appetite 2018; 123: 233–40. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.12.024

  52. Johnson B, Zarnowiecki D, Hendrie G, Mauch C, Golley R. How to reduce parental provision of unhealthy foods to 3-to 8-year-old children in the home environment? A systematic review utilizing the Behaviour Change Wheel framework. Obes Rev 2018; 19: 1359–70. doi: 10.1111/obr.12702

  53. Wyse R, Campbell E, Nathan N, Wolfenden L. Associations between characteristics of the home food environment and fruit and vegetable intake in preschool children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 938. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-938

  54. Hass J, Hartmann MJA. What determines the fruit and vegetables intake of primary school children? An analysis of personal and social determinants. Appetite 2018; 120: 82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.017

  55. Glasson C, Chapman K, James E. Fruit and vegetables should be targeted separately in health promotion programmes: differences in consumption levels, barriers, knowledge and stages of readiness for change. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 694–701. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010001643

  56. Appleton KM, Hemingway A, Saulais L, Dinnella C, Monteleone E, Depezay L, et al. Increasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions. Eur J Nutr 2016; 55: 869. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-1130-8

  57. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci 2011; 6: 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980

  58. Montano DE, Kasprzyk D. Theory of reasoned action, theory of planned behavior, and the integrated behavioral model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, eds. Health behavior: theory, research and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2015, pp. 95–124.

  59. Laws RA, Litterbach EKV, Denney-Wilson EA, Russell CG, Taki S, Ong KL, et al. A comparison of recruitment methods for an mHealth intervention targeting mothers: lessons from the growing healthy program. J Med Internet Res 2016; 18.9: e248. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5691

  60. Hansen AH, Bradway M, Broz J, Claudi T, Henriksen Ø, Wangberg SC, et al. Inequalities in the use of eHealth between socioeconomic groups among patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21: e13615. doi: 10.2196/13615

  61. Haire-Joshu D, Elliott MB, Caito NM, Hessler K, Nanney MS, Hale N, et al. High 5 for Kids: the impact of a home visiting program on fruit and vegetable intake of parents and their preschool children. Prev Med 2008; 47: 77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2008.03.016

  62. Nygård G. Facts about education in Norway 2019, – key figures 2017. Oslo: Statistics Norway; 2019.

  63. Pinket A-S, De Craemer M, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Deforche B, Cardon G, Androutsos O, et al. Can parenting practices explain the differences in beverage intake according to socio-economic status: the ToyBox-study. Nutrients 2016; 8: 591. doi: 10.3390/nu8100591

  64. Spence AC, Campbell KJ, Lioret S, McNaughton SA. Early childhood vegetable, fruit, and discretionary food intakes do not meet dietary guidelines, but do show socioeconomic differences and tracking over time. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018; 118: 1634–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.12.009

Published
2020-10-12
How to Cite
Røed, M., Vik, F. N., Hillesund, E. R., Van Lippevelde, W., & Øverby, N. C. (2020). Associations between parental food choice motives, health-promoting feeding practices, and infants’ fruit and vegetable intakes: the Food4toddlers study. Food & Nutrition Research, 64. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v64.3730
Section
Original Articles