Carbohydrates – a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023

Emily Sonestedt; Nina Øverby

doi:10.29219/fnr.v67.10226

Emily Sonestedt Nutritional Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
Nina Øverby Department of Nutrition and Public Health, Centre for Lifecourse Nutrition, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.10226

Keywords: carbohydrates, sugars, glycaemic index, recommendations

Abstract

Background: Dietary carbohydrates are a major source of energy in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The health effects of different types of carbohydrates vary and there is a need to update the evidence regarding specific carbohydrates and their effects on health-related outcomes.

Objective: The aim of this scoping review was to describe the evidence for the role of total carbohydrates (fiber excluded), glycemic index (GI) or glycemic load (GL) and added or free sugars for health-related outcomes as a basis for setting and updating dietary reference values for the Nordic Nutrition Recommendation (NNR) 2023.

Method: We included evidence from several qualified systematic reviews (the World Cancer Research Fund, the European Food Safety Authority, the World Health Organization, the United States Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, the United Kingdom Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition) identified by the NNR project in line with the protocol description.

Results: There is limited evidence that total carbohydrate intake (fiber excluded) outside of the current recommended range of 45–60% of energy is associated with health-related outcomes. There were no consistent benefits on clinical outcomes when changing the GI of a diet. High intake of dietary sugars is well known to be associated with dental caries. There was evidence from randomized control trials on surrogate disease endpoints, for a positive and causal relationship between the intake of added and free sugars and risk of some chronic metabolic diseases with moderate level of certainty for obesity and dyslipidaemia. The level of certainty was high for an association between high intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of several chronic metabolic diseases.

Conclusion: While there is limited evidence that total carbohydrates and GI and GL of the diet are related to health outcomes, the evidence suggests that high intakes of added and free sugars are related to detrimental health effects. In addition, with increasing intake of added and free sugars, there is less room for healthy foods and micronutrients, which is especially important for those with low energy intake, such as children.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.
Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012 – intergrating nutrition and physical activity. 5th ed. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministres; 2014.

2.
Trumbo P, Schlicker S, Yates AA, Poos M. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J Am Diet Assoc 2002; 102(11): 1621–30. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(02)90346-9

3.
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Scientific Report of the 2020 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee: Advisory Report to the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service; 2020.

4.
WHO. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.

5.
Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN). Carbohydrates and Health. London: Public Health England; 2015.

6.
EFSA Panel on Nutrition NFaFA. Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars. EFSA J 2022; 20(2): 337.

7.
Sonestedt E, Overby NC, Laaksonen DE, Birgisdottir BE. Does high sugar consumption exacerbate cardiometabolic risk factors and increase the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease? Food Nutr Res 2012; 56: 1–19. doi: 10.3402/fnr.v56i0.19104

8.
Blomhoff R, Andersen R, Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, et al. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2023. doi: 10.6027/nord2023-003

9.
Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Hoyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – principles and methodologies. Food Nutr Res 2020; 64: 1–15. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4402

10.
Höyer A, Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2021; 65: 7828. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7828

11.
Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Hoyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2020; 64: 1–11. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4403

12.
European Food Safety Authority. Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for carbohydrates and dietary fiber. EFSA J 2010; 8: 1462. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1462

13.
Reynolds A, Mann J, Cummings J, Winter N, Mete E, Te Morenga L. Carbohydrate quality and human health: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Lancet 2019; 393(10170): 434–45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31809-9

14.
Te Morenga L, Mallard S, Mann J. Dietary sugars and body weight: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials and cohort studies. BMJ 2013; 346: e7492. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7492

15.
Moynihan PJ, Kelly SA. Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO guidelines. J Dent Res 2014; 93(1): 8–18. doi: 10.1177/0022034513508954

16.
World Cancer Research Fund, American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective. Continuous update project expert report. 2018.

17.
Jenkins DJ, Wolever TM, Taylor RH, Barker H, Fielden H, Baldwin JM, et al. Glycemic index of foods: a physiological basis for carbohydrate exchange. Am J Clin Nutr 1981; 34(3): 362–6. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/34.3.362

18.
Atkinson FS, Brand-Miller JC, Foster-Powell K, Buyken AE, Goletzke J. International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values 2021: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2021; 114(5): 1625–32. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab233

19.
Bjorck I, Liljeberg H, Ostman E. Low glycaemic-index foods. Br J Nutr 2000; 83 Suppl 1: S149–55. doi: 10.1017/S0007114500001094

20.
Salmeron J, Ascherio A, Rimm EB, Colditz GA, Spiegelman D, Jenkins DJ, et al. Dietary fiber, glycemic load, and risk of NIDDM in men. Diabetes Care 1997; 20(4): 545–50. doi: 10.2337/diacare.20.4.545

21.
Lemming EW, Pitsi T. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – food consumption and nutrient intake in the adult population of the Nordic and Baltic countries. Food Nutr Res 2022; 66: 1–11. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v66.8572

22.
Jepsen S, Blanco J, Buchalla W, Carvalho JC, Dietrich T, Dorfer C, et al. Prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level: consensus report of group 3 of joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol 2017; 44 Suppl 18: S85–93. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12687

23.
Louie JC, Tapsell LC. Association between intake of total vs added sugar on diet quality: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2015; 73(12): 837–57. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv044

24.
Tammi R, Maukonen M, Mannisto S, Sares-Jaske L, Kanerva N, Kaartinen NE. Association between added sugar intake and overall diet quality in the Finnish adult population. Br J Nutr. 2022; 128(9): 1848–1856. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521004736

25.
Mumena WA. Consumption of free sugar predicts nutrient intake of Saudi Children. Front Nutr 2021; 8: 782853. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.782853

26.
Fujiwara A, Okada E, Okada C, Matsumoto M, Takimoto H. Association between free sugars intake and nutrient dilution among Japanese adults: the 2016 National Health and Nutrition Survey, Japan. Eur J Nutr 2020; 59(8): 3827–39. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02213-4

27.
Lai HT, Hutchinson J, Evans CEL. Non-milk extrinsic sugars intake and food and nutrient consumption patterns among adolescents in the UK national diet and nutrition survey, years 2008–16. Nutrients 2019; 11(7): 1–18. doi: 10.3390/nu11071621

28.
Dello Russo M, Ahrens W, De Henauw S, Eiben G, Hebestreit A, Kourides Y, et al. The impact of adding sugars to milk and fruit on adiposity and diet quality in children: a cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of the identification and prevention of dietary- and lifestyle-induced health effects in children and infants (IDEFICS) Study. Nutrients 2018; 10(10): 1–12. doi: 10.3390/nu10101350

29.
Mok A, Ahmad R, Rangan A, Louie JCY. Intake of free sugars and micronutrient dilution in Australian adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2018; 107(1): 94–104. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx008

30.
Jyvakorpi SK, Pitkala KH, Puranen TM, Bjorkman MP, Kautiainen H, Strandberg TE, et al. High intake of nonmilk extrinsic sugars is associated with protein and micronutrient dilution in home-dwelling and institutionalized older people. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 18(4): 301–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.09.023

31.
Gibson S, Francis L, Newens K, Livingstone B. Associations between free sugars and nutrient intakes among children and adolescents in the UK. Br J Nutr 2016; 116(7): 1265–74. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516003184

32.
Moshtaghian H, Louie JC, Charlton KE, Probst YC, Gopinath B, Mitchell P, et al. Added sugar intake that exceeds current recommendations is associated with nutrient dilution in older Australians. Nutrition 2016; 32(9): 937–42. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2016.02.004

33.
Sluik D, van Lee L, Engelen AI, Feskens EJ. Total, free, and added sugar consumption and adherence to guidelines: the dutch national food consumption survey 2007–2010. Nutrients 2016; 8(2): 70. doi: 10.3390/nu8020070

34.
Gonzalez-Padilla E, J AD, Ramne S, Olsson K, Nalsen C, Sonestedt E. Association between added sugar intake and micronutrient dilution: a cross-sectional study in two adult Swedish populations. Nutr Metab 2020; 17: 15. doi: 10.1186/s12986-020-0428-6

35.
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. 9th Edition. December 2020. Available at DietaryGuidelines.gov.

36.
United States. Department of Health and Human Services, United States. Department of Agriculture, United States. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee. Dietary guidelines for Americans, 2015–2020. Eighth edition. ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and U.S. Department of Agriculture; 2015, 122p.

37.
EFSA Panel on Nutrition NFaFA. Annex D (Results of the intake assessment whole population) in Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars. EFSA J 2022; 20(2): Annex D.

Carbohydrates – a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023

Abstract

Downloads

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)