Sweets and other sugary foods – a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023

Henna Vepsäläinen; Emily Sonestedt

doi:10.29219/fnr.v68.10488

Henna Vepsäläinen Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;
Emily Sonestedt Nutritional Epidemiology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

DOI: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v68.10488

Keywords: Sweets, confectionary, chocolate, desserts, sugars, dietary recommendations

Abstract

Background: Sweets, chocolate, and sweet bakery products are generally high in energy and added sugar, whereas the levels of essential nutrients and fibre are low. According to sales statistics, the consumption of sweets and chocolate is high in the Nordic and Baltic countries.

Objective: This scoping review describes the totality of evidence for the role of sweets and other sugary foods for health-related outcomes as a basis for setting and updating food-based dietary guidelines in the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023 (NNR2023) project.

Design: We conducted a literature search to identify systematic reviews published between 2011 and 2021. The literature search resulted in 756 papers, of which 12 were included in this scoping review as sources of evidence. We also used evidence from the European Food Safety Authority’s (EFSA) scientific opinion on tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars published in 2022.

Results: Most of the papers included from the search focused on chocolate or cocoa, which are rich in flavonoids. We found some evidence linking chocolate consumption with lower blood pressure, lower risk of type 2 diabetes, and improved insulin markers, but the evidence was ranked low or very low. The search did not identify systematic reviews investigating the associations between other sugary food consumption and health outcomes. In the EFSA review, conclusions were not drawn for other sugar sources than sugar-sweetened beverages. However, for fasting glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, fasting triglycerides, and uric acid, there was a statistically significant effect of high sugar intake from solid foods compared to low sugar intake.

Conclusion: Because sweets, chocolate, and other sugary foods are high in energy and added sugar, and low in essential nutrients and fibre, it is reasonable to limit their consumption, which is reported high in the Nordic countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.
Trattner S, Becker W, Wretling S, Ohrvik V, Mattisson I. Fatty acid composition of Swedish bakery products, with emphasis on trans-fatty acids. Food Chem 2015; 175: 423–30. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.145

2.
Arranz S, Valderas-Martinez P, Chiva-Blanch G, Casas R, Urpi-Sarda M, Lamuela-Raventos RM, et al. Cardioprotective effects of cocoa: clinical evidence from randomized clinical intervention trials in humans. Mol Nutr Food Res 2013; 57(6): 936–47. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200595

3.
The Swedish Food Agency food database, version 2021-05-03 [Internet]. Available from: https://www7.slv.se/SokNaringsinnehall/ [cited 12 March 2022].

4.
Steinberg FM, Bearden MM, Keen CL. Cocoa and chocolate flavonoids: implications for cardiovascular health. J Am Diet Assoc 2003; 103(2): 215–23. doi: 10.1053/jada.2003.50028

5.
Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012 – intergrating nutrition and physical activity. 5th ed. Copenhagen; Nordic Council of Ministers, 2014.

6.
Blomhoff R, Andersen R, Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, et al. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023. Copenhagen; Nordic Council of Ministers, 2023.

7.
Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Hoyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – principles and methodologies. Food Nutr Res 2022; 64. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4402

8.
Höyer A, Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2021; 65: 7828. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7828

9.
EFSA Panel on Nutrition NFaFA. Scientific opinion on the Tolerable Upper Intake Level for dietary sugars. EFSA J 2022; 20(2): 337.

10.
Caobisco Statistical Bulletin. Brussel; Caobisco, 2020.

11.
Vepsalainen H, Nevalainen J, Kinnunen S, Itkonen ST, Meinila J, Mannisto S, et al. Do we eat what we buy? Relative validity of grocery purchase data as an indicator of food consumption in the LoCard study. Br J Nutr 2022; 128(9): 1780–1788. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521004177

12.
Lemming EW, Pitsi T. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – food consumption and nutrient intake in the adult population of the Nordic and Baltic countries. Food Nutr Res 2022; 66. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v66.8572

13.
Valsta L, Kaakinen M, Tapanainen H, Männistö S, Sääksjärvi K. Ravitsemus Suomessa: FinRavinto 2017 –tutkimus. Helsinki; National Institute for Health and Welfare, 2018.

14.
Amcoff E, Edberg A, Enghardt Barbieri H, Lindroos A, Nälsén C, Warensjö Lemming E. Riksmaten vuxna 2010–11: Livsmedels- och näringsintag bland vuxna i Sverige. Uppsala; Livsmedelsverket, 2012.

15.
Buitrago-Lopez A, Sanderson J, Johnson L, Warnakula S, Wood A, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Chocolate consumption and cardiometabolic disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 343: d4488. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d4488

16.
Veronese N, Demurtas J, Celotto S, Caruso MG, Maggi S, Bolzetta F, et al. Is chocolate consumption associated with health outcomes? An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Clin Nutr 2019; 38(3): 1101–8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.05.019

17.
Gasser CE, Mensah FK, Russell M, Dunn SE, Wake M. Confectionery consumption and overweight, obesity, and related outcomes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103(5): 1344–56. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.119883

18.
Toi PL, Anothaisintawee T, Chaikledkaew U, Briones JR, Reutrakul S, Thakkinstian A. Preventive role of diet interventions and dietary factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an umbrella review. Nutrients 2020; 12(9): 2722. doi: 10.3390/nu12092722

19.
Neuenschwander M, Ballon A, Weber KS, Norat T, Aune D, Schwingshackl L, et al. Role of diet in type 2 diabetes incidence: umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective observational studies. BMJ 2019; 366: l2368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l2368

20.
Larsson SC, Drca N, Jensen-Urstad M, Wolk A. Chocolate consumption and risk of atrial fibrillation: two cohort studies and a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2018; 195: 86–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.09.013

21.
Garcia-Blanco T, Davalos A, Visioli F. Tea, cocoa, coffee, and affective disorders: vicious or virtuous cycle? J Affect Disord 2017; 224: 61–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.11.033

22.
Halib H, Ismail A, Mohd Yusof BN, Osakabe N, Mat Daud ZA. Effects of cocoa polyphenols and dark chocolate on obese adults: a scoping review. Nutrients 2020; 12(12): 3695. doi: 10.3390/nu12123695

23.
Ried K, Fakler P, Stocks NP. Effect of cocoa on blood pressure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 4: CD008893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008893.pub3

24.
Tokede OA, Gaziano JM, Djousse L. Effects of cocoa products/dark chocolate on serum lipids: a meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65(8): 879–86. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2011.64

25.
Hooper L, Kay C, Abdelhamid A, Kroon PA, Cohn JS, Rimm EB, et al. Effects of chocolate, cocoa, and flavan-3-ols on cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95(3): 740–51. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.023457

26.
Gijsbers L, Ding EL, Malik VS, de Goede J, Geleijnse JM, Soedamah-Muthu SS. Consumption of dairy foods and diabetes incidence: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103(4): 1111–24. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.123216

27.
Pan A, Hu FB. Effects of carbohydrates on satiety: differences between liquid and solid food. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2011; 14(4): 385–90. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328346df36

28.
Louie JC, Tapsell LC. Association between intake of total vs added sugar on diet quality: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2015; 73(12): 837–57. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuv044

29.
Ellam S, Williamson G. Cocoa and human health. Annu Rev Nutr 2013; 33: 105–28. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071811-150642

30.
EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergenes. Annex D (Results of the intake assessment whole population) in Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for dietary sugars. EFSA J 2022; 20(2): Annex D.

Sweets and other sugary foods – a scoping review for Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023

Abstract

Downloads

References

Most read articles by the same author(s)