The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – principles and methodologies

  • Jacob Juel Christensen Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Familial Hypercholesterolemia, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, and Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Norway
  • Erik Kristoffer Arnesen Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Norway
  • Rikke Andersen National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
  • Hanna Eneroth The Swedish Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Maijaliisa Erkkola Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Anne Høyer The Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Eva Warensjö Lemming The Swedish Food Agency, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Helle Margrete Meltzer Department of Environmental Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Þórhallur Ingi Þórhallsson School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
  • Inga Þórsdóttir School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
  • Ursula Schwab Department of Medicine, Endocrinology and Clinical Nutrition, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, and Institute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio Campus, Kuopio, Finland
  • Ellen Trolle National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
  • Rune Blomhoff Department of Nutrition, University of Oslo, Norway; The Norwegian Directorate of Health, Oslo, and Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v64.4402
Keywords: Dietary reference values, food-based dietary guidelines, systematic reviews, Nordic countries, the Baltics, national food and health authorities, evidence-based nutrition, nutrient recommendations

Abstract

Background: The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations (NNRs) constitute the scientific basis for national dietary reference values (DRVs) and food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs) in the Nordic and Baltic countries.

Objective: To define principles and methodologies for the sixth edition of NNR to be published in 2022 (NNR2022).

Design: The principles and methodologies of the previous edition of NNR were used as a starting point. Recent nutrition recommendations commissioned by other national food and health authorities or international food and health organizations were examined and dissected. Updated principles and methodologies were agreed by the NNR2022 Committee in a consensus-driven process.

Results: An organizational model with ‘checks and balances’ was developed to minimize the influence of subjective biases of the committee members and experts. Individual chapters on all included nutrients and food groups will be updated as scoping reviews. Systematic reviews (SRs), which are the main basis for evaluating causal effects of nutrients or food groups on health outcomes, will be embedded in each chapter. A NNR SR Centre will be established for performing de novo SRs on prioritized topics. To avoid duplication and optimize the use of resources, qualified SRs commissioned by other national and international organizations and health authorities will also inform DRVs and FBDGs in NNR2022.

Discussion: The evidence-based methods defined in the NNR2022 project are compatible with most contemporary methods used by leading national food and health authorities. Global harmonization of methodological approaches to nutrition recommendations is strongly encouraged.

Conclusion: Evidence-informed principles and methodologies underpinned by SRs will ensure that DRVs and FBDGs defined in the NNR2022 project are based on the best available evidence and as far as possible free from overt bias.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


  1. Nordic Council of Ministers. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2012: integrating nutrition and physical activity. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. Report No: 5. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers; 2014, p. 627. doi: 10.6027/Nord2014-002

  2. Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – Structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2020. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4403

  3. Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – Handbook for qualified systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2020. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v63.4404

  4. Mozaffarian D. Conflict of interest and the role of the food industry in nutrition research. JAMA 2017; 317(17): 1755–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3456

  5. Soares MJ, Müller MJ, Boeing H, Maffeis C, Misra A, Muscogiuri G, et al. Conflict of interest in nutrition research: an editorial perspective. Eur J Clin Nutr 2019; 73(9): 1213–5. doi: 10.1038/s41430-019-0488-8

  6. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JPA, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009 21; 6(7): e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100

  7. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med 2018; 169(7): 467–73. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850

  8. Blake P, Durão S, Naude CE, Bero L. An analysis of methods used to synthesize evidence and grade recommendations in food-based dietary guidelines. Nutr Rev 2018; 76(4): 290–300. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux074

  9. Higgins JP, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version [Internet]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2019. Report No.: 6. 2019. Available from: handbook.cochrane.org [cited 2019 November 24].

  10. Laake P. Epidemiologiske og kliniske forskningsmetoder. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2007.

  11. Aalen OO, Frigessi A. Statistiske metoder i medisin og helsefag. Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk; 2008.

  12. Thelle D. Innføring i epidemiologi. Oslo: Cappelen Akademiske Forlag; 2004.

  13. Alberts B. Molecular biology of the cell: reference edition. New York: Garland Science; 2008.

  14. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research. Continuous update project expert report – the third expert report; 2018. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective. Available from: dietandcancerreport.org [cited 2019 November 24].

  15. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute of Cancer Research. Judging the evidence [Internet]. Continuous update project expert report – the third expert report; 2018. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective. Available from: dietandcancerreport.org [cited 2019 November 24].

  16. World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation. Uncertain: WHO Technical Report Series. 2003.

  17. Hill AB. The environment and disease: association or causation? J R Soc Med 2015; 108(1): 32–7. doi: 10.1177/0141076814562718

  18. Hill AB, Hill ID. Bradford Hills’s principles of medical statistics. London: Edward Arnold, 1991.

  19. Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.

  20. Maldonado G, Greenland S. Estimating causal effects. Int J Epidemiol 2002; 31(2): 422–9.

  21. Holmes MV, Ala-Korpela M, Smith GD. Mendelian randomization in cardiometabolic disease: challenges in evaluating causality. Nat Rev Cardiol 2017; 14(10): 577–90. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.78

  22. Koellinger PD, de Vlaming R. Mendelian randomization: the challenge of unobserved environmental confounds. Int J Epidemiol 2019; 48(3): 665–71. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz138

  23. VanderWeele TJ, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Cornelis M, Kraft P. Methodological challenges in Mendelian randomization. Epidemiology 2014; 25(3): 427–35. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000081

  24. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A (editors). GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations [Internet]. Report No.: 6. Cochrane methods: The GRADE Working Group; 2013 [cited 24 November 2019]. Available from: gdt.guidelinedevelopment.org/app/handbook/handbook.html

  25. Otten JJ, Hellwig JP, Meyers LD (editors). Dietary reference intakes: the essential guide to nutrient requirements. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine (IoM) of the National Academies; 2006.

  26. Dietary reference values for food energy and nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report of the panel on dietary reference values of the Committee on Medical Aspects of Food Policy. Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond). 1991; 41: 1–210.

  27. EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition, and Allergies (NDA). Scientific opinion on principles for deriving and applying dietary reference values. EFSA J 2010; 8(3): 1458.

Published
2020-06-18
How to Cite
Juel Christensen J., Arnesen E. K., Andersen R., Eneroth H., Erkkola M., Høyer A., Warensjö Lemming E., Meltzer H. M., Þórhallsson Þórhallur I., Þórsdóttir I., Schwab U., Trolle E., & Blomhoff R. (2020). The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – principles and methodologies. Food & Nutrition Research, 64. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v64.4402
Issue
Vol 64 (2020)
Section
Review Articles

Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to SNF Swedish Nutrition Foundation. Read the full Copyright- and Licensing Statement.

 

 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)