Evaluation of Nutri-Score and NewTools-score in a Norwegian setting using a reference standard based on nutrition experts’ ranking of foods’ healthiness

  • Mari Mohn Paulsen Department of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Sustainable Diets, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Lisa Bucher Holm Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway
  • Anna Amberntsson Department of Food Safety, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Sustainable Diets, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway;
  • Marianne Hope Abel Centre for Sustainable Diets, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Centre for Evaluation of Public Health Measures, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physical Health and Ageing, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
  • Lene Frost Andersen Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway
Keywords: Nutrient profiling, Front-of-pack nutrition label, Convergent validity, Validation, Healthiness rating, Food-based dietary guidelines

Abstract

Background: The Nutri-Score is a color-coded front-of-pack nutrition label that classifies foods and beverages from A (higher nutritional quality) to E (lower nutritional quality). The NewTools-score is an adaptation of the Nutri-Score 2023-version, modified to better align with the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. Validating nutrient profiling models in different countries is crucial for their reliability and effectiveness in promoting healthier food choices and combating non-communicable diseases.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the convergent validity of the Nutri-Score and the NewTools-score by evaluating their agreement with a reference standard based on rankings of foods’ healthiness by Norwegian nutrition experts. Additionally, we examined the consistency among these experts in rating foods’ healthiness representative of the Norwegian diet.

Design: Between August and December 2023, 29 nutrition experts completed a web-based questionnaire, scoring 100 foods on a scale from 1 (less healthy) to 6 (very healthy) based on the Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines. Agreement among experts was evaluated using descriptive statistics and Cronbach’s alpha. We calculated both Nutri-Score and NewTools-score for all 100 foods and assessed their agreement with the reference standard through cross-classification and score distribution analyses.

Results: The nutrition experts exhibited high agreement in their healthiness ratings of foods representative of the Norwegian diet. The Nutri-Score 2023-version showed good agreement with the experts for most foods, although discrepancies were observed for wholegrain and refined grains, fat content in dairy products, certain fish products, and plant-based dairy and meat substitutes. The NewTools-score displayed overall better agreement with the reference standard for several foods and with fewer discrepancies.

Conclusions: Norwegian nutrition experts showed high agreement in rating the healthiness of foods representative of the Norwegian diet. While the Nutri-Score 2023-version aligned well with experts’ ratings, the NewTools-score demonstrated better agreement than Nutri-Score in this Norwegian context, despite some remaining discrepancies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


1.
Haddad L, Hawkes C, Waage J, Webb P, Godfray C, Toulmin C. Food systems and diets: facing the challenges of the 21st century 2016. Available from: https://www.glopan.org/sites/default/files/Downloads/Foresight%20Report.pdf [cited 14 September 2024].


2.
World Health Organization. Nutrient profiling: report of a WHO/IASO technical meeting, London, 4–6 October 2010; 2011. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/336447 [cited 11 September 2024].


3.
Rayner M. Nutrient profiling for regulatory purposes. Proc Nutr Soc 2017; 76(3): 230–6. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117000362


4.
World Health Organization. Use of nutrient profile models for nutrition and health policies: meeting report on the use of nutrient profile models in the WHO European Region, September 2021. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe; 2022. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/363379/WHO-EURO-2022-6201-45966-66383-eng.pdf?sequence [cited 11 September 2024].


5.
World Health Organization. State of play of WHO guidance on front-of-the-pack labelling 2021. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/27-09-2021-state-of-play-of-who-guidance-on-front-of-the-pack-labelling [cited 20 August 2024].


6.
Hercberg S, Touvier M, Salas-Salvado J, Peña Quintana L. The Nutri-Score nutrition label: a public health tool based on rigorous scientific evidence aiming to improve the nutritional status of the population. Int J Vitamin Nutr Res 2022; 92(3–4): 147–57. doi: 10.1024/0300-9831/a000722


7.
EU Scientists & Health Professionals for Nutri-Score. Why the European commission must choose the Nutri-Score nutritional label – A public health tool based on rigorous scientific evidence–as the mandatory nutrition label for Europe 2023. Available from: https://nutriscore-europe.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/NS_rapport-EU-V10_230202.pdf [cited 4 August 2024].


8.
Chantal J, Hercberg S, World Health Organization. Development of a new front-of-pack nutrition label in France: the five-colour Nutri-Score. Public Health Panorama 2017; 3(04): 712–25.


9.
The Scientific Committee of Nutri-Score. Update of the Nutri-Score algorithm for beverages. Second update report from the Scientific Committee of the Nutri-Score V2 – 2023. Santé Publique France; 2023. Available from: https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/determinants-de-sante/nutrition-et-activite-physique/documents/rapport-synthese/update-of-the-nutri-score-algorithm-for-beverages.-second-update-report-from-the-scientific-committee-of-the-nutri-score-v2-2023 [cited 11 September 2024.]


10.
The Scientific Committee of the Nutri-Score. Update of the Nutri-Score algorithm. Update report from the Scientific Committee of the Nutri-Score 2022. Santé Publique France; 2022. Available from: https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/_Food-and-Nutrition/nutri-score-update-algorithm.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 [Accessed 11 September 2024].


11.
Arambepola C, Scarborough P, Rayner M. Validating a nutrient profile model. Public Health Nutr 2008; 11(4): 371–8. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007000377


12.
Townsend MS. Where is the science? What will it take to show that nutrient profiling systems work? Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91(4): 1109s–15s. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28450F


13.
Martin C, Turcotte M, Cauchon J, Lachance A, Pomerleau S, Provencher V, et al. Systematic review of nutrient profile models developed for nutrition-related policies and regulations aimed at noncommunicable disease prevention – an update. Adv Nutr 2023; 14(6): 1499–522. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2023.08.013


14.
Øvrebø B, Brantsæter A, Lund-Iversen K, Andersen L, Paulsen MM, Abel MH. How does the updated Nutri-Score discriminate and classify the nutritional quality of foods in a Norwegian setting? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity 2023; 20(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01525-y


15.
Dréano-Trécant L, Egnell M, Hercberg S, Galan P, Soudon J, Fialon M, et al. Performance of the front-of-pack nutrition label Nutri-Score to discriminate the nutritional quality of foods products: a comparative study across 8 European countries. Nutrients 2020; 12(5): 1303. doi: 10.3390/nu12051303


16.
Paulsen MM, Øvrebø B, Løvhaug AL, Lund-Iversen K, Andersen LF, Helleve A, et al. Responses to the updated Nutri-Score algorithms in Norway: a qualitative study among food system actors in the NewTools-project. Food Nutr Res 2024; 68: 10254. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v68.10254


17.
Norwegian Institute of Public Health. About NewTools [Om NewTools]: Norwegian Institute of Public Health; 2022. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/kl/studier/newtools/om-newtools/om-newtools/ [cited 11 July 2024].


18.
Amberntsson A, Paulsen MM, Bianchi MA, Birgisdóttir BE, Biltoft-Jensen AP, Konglevoll DM, et al. Improvements to the Nutri-Score to address challenges identified in a Nordic setting. Food Nutr Res 2025; 69: 10914. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v69.10914


19.
World Health Organization. Guiding principles and framework manual for front-of-pack labelling for promoting healthy diet 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/guidingprinciples-labelling-promoting-healthydiet [cited 20 August 2024].


20.
Scarborough P, Rayner M, Stockley L, Black A. Nutrition professionals’ perception of the ‘healthiness’ of individual foods. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10(4): 346–53. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007666683


21.
Scarborough P, Boxer A, Rayner M, Stockley L. Testing nutrient profile models using data from a survey of nutrition professionals. Public Health Nutr 2007; 10(4): 337–45. doi: 10.1017/S1368980007666671


22.
The Norwegian Directorate of Health. Kostrådene (The dietary recommendations). 2016. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/faglige-rad/kostradene-og-naeringsstoffer/kostrad-for-befolkningen [cited 14 August 2023].


23.
Azais-Braesco V, Goffi C, Labouze E. Nutrient profiling: comparison and critical analysis of existing systems. Public Health Nutr 2006; 9(5): 613–22. doi: 10.1079/PHN2006966


24.
Martin JM, Beshears J, Milkman KL, Bazerman MH, Sutherland LA. Modeling expert opinions on food healthfulness: a nutrition metric. J Am Diet Assoc 2009; 109(6): 1088–91. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.03.009


25.
Totland TH, Melnæs BK, Lundberg-Hallen N, Helland-Kigen KM, Lund-Blix NA, Myhre JB, et al. Norkost 3 En landsomfattende kostholdsundersøkelse blant menn og kvinner i Norge i alderen 18–70 år, 2010–11. Oslo: Helsedirektoratet. 2012, p. 67.


26.
Pitt S, Julin B, Øvrebø B, Wolk A. Front-of-pack nutrition labels: comparing the Nordic Keyhole and Nutri-Score in a Swedish context. Nutrients 2023; 15(4): 873. doi: 10.3390/nu15040873


27.
Huybers S, Roodenburg AJ. Nutri-Score of meat, fish, and dairy alternatives: a comparison between the old and new algorithm. Nutrients 2024; 16(6): 892. doi: 10.3390/nu16060892


28.
Nofima. Development in sales of plant-based products in Norwat [Utvikling i salg av plantebaserte produkter i Norge] 2024. Available from: https://nofima.brage.unit.no/nofima-xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/3135553/Rapport%2B23-2024%2BKj%25C3%25B8tterstattere.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [cited 25 January 2025].


29.
The Smart Protein Project. Plant-based foods in Europe: how big is the market? 2021. Available from: https://smartproteinproject.eu/plant-based-food-sector-report/ [cited 30 January 2025].


30.
Mattilsynet. Matvaretabellen 2021. 2021. Available from: www.matvaretabellen.no [cited 4 July 2023].


31.
Thurecht RL, Pelly FE, Cooper SL. Dietitians’ perceptions of the healthiness of packaged food. Appetite 2018; 120: 302–9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.036


32.
DATAtab Team. Cronbach’s Alpha DATAtab; 2024. Available from: https://datatab.net/tutorial/cronbachs-alpha [cited 21 June 2024].


33.
Hafner E, Pravst I. Evaluation of the ability of nutri-score to discriminate the nutritional quality of prepacked foods using a sale-weighting approach. Foods 2021; 10(8): 1689. doi: 10.3390/foods10081689


34.
Szabo de Edelenyi F, Egnell M, Galan P, Druesne-Pecollo N, Hercberg S, Julia C. Ability of the Nutri-Score front-of-pack nutrition label to discriminate the nutritional quality of foods in the German food market and consistency with nutritional recommendations. Arch Public Health 2019; 77: 1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13690-019-0357-x


35.
Merz B, Temme E, Alexiou H, Beulens JWJ, Buyken AE, Bohn T, et al. Nutri-Score 2023 update. Nat Food 2024; 5(2): 102–10. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-00920-3


36.
Nordic Councils of Ministers. Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2023. Integrating environmental aspects 2023. Available from: https://www.norden.org/en/publication/nordic-nutrition-recommendations-2023 [cited 23 February 2024].


37.
Commonwealth of Australia. Applying health star ratings – guidance for industry 2023. Available from: http://healthstarrating.gov.au/internet/healthstarrating/publishing.nsf/Content/guide-for-industry [cited 3 October 2024].


38.
Ter Borg S, Steenbergen E, Milder IE, Temme EH. Evaluation of nutri-score in relation to dietary guidelines and food reformulation in The Netherlands. Nutrients 2021; 13(12): 4536. doi: 10.3390/nu13124536


39.
Norwegian Ministries. Norwegian national action plan for a healthier diet 2017. Available from: https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/fab53cd681b247bfa8c03a3767c75e66/norwegian_national_action_plan_for_a_healthier_diet_an_outline.pdf [cited 4 July 2024].


40.
Huybers S, Roodenburg AJC. Cross-sectional study to map nutritional quality of meat, fish, and dairy alternatives in Dutch supermarkets according to the Dutch food-based dietary guidelines and Nutri-Score. Foods 2023; 12(9): 1738. doi: 10.3390/foods12091738
Published
2025-03-24
How to Cite
Mohn Paulsen , M., Bucher Holm , L., Amberntsson , A., Hope Abel , M., & Frost Andersen , L. (2025). Evaluation of Nutri-Score and NewTools-score in a Norwegian setting using a reference standard based on nutrition experts’ ranking of foods’ healthiness. Food & Nutrition Research, 69. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v69.11444
Section
Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)