White meat consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Alfons Ramel Faculty of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • Bright I. Nwaru Krefting Research Centre, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Christel Lamberg-Allardt Department of Food and Nutrition, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • Birna Thorisdottir Health Science Institute, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
  • Linnea Bärebring Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
  • Fredrik Söderlund Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
  • Erik Kristoffer Arnesen Department of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  • Jutta Dierkes Centre for Nutrition, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; and Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
  • Agneta Åkesson Unit of Cardiovascular and Nutritional Epidemiology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.9543
Keywords: White meat consumption, systematic review, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, Nordic Nutrition Recommendations

Abstract

Objectives: The aim was to systematically review the associations among white meat consumption, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), and type 2 diabetes (T2D).

Methods: Databases MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Scopus were searched (15th October 2021) for randomized intervention trials (RCTs, ≥ 4 weeks of duration) and prospective cohort studies (≥12 month of follow-up) assessing the consumption of white meat as the intervention/exposure. Eligible outcomes for RCTs were cardiometabolic risk factors and for cohorts, fatal and non-fatal CVD and incident T2D. Risk of bias was estimated using the Cochrane’s RoB2 and Risk of Bias for Nutrition Observational Studies. Meta-analysis was conducted in case of ≥3 relevant intervention studies or ≥5 cohort studies using random-effects models. The strength of evidence was evaluated using the World Cancer Research Fund’s criteria.

Results: The literature search yielded 5,795 scientific articles, and after screening 43 full-text articles, 23 cohort studies and three intervention studies were included. All included intervention studies matched fat content of intervention and control diets, and none of them showed any significant effects on the selected outcomes of white meat when compared to red meat. Findings from the cohort studies generally did not support any associations between white meat intake and outcomes. Meta-analyses were conducted for CVD mortality (RR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87–1.02, P = 0.23, I2 = 25%) and T2D incidence (RR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.87–1.11, P = 0.81, I2 = 82%).

Conclusion: The currently available evidence does not indicate a role, beneficial or detrimental, of white meat consumption for CVD and T2D. Future studies investigating potentially different health effects of processed versus unprocessed white meat and substitution of red meat with white meat are warranted.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References


1.
Our world in Data. Meat and Dairy Production. 2019. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production#which-countrieseat-the-most-meat [cited 9 May 2022]


2.
Torgeirsdóttir H, Valgeirsdóttir H, Gunnarsdóttir I, Gísladóttir E, Gunnarsdóttir B, Tórsdóttir I, et al. Hvað borða Íslendingar? Könnun á mataræði Íslendinga 2010–2011 (The Diet of Icelanders, Dietary Survey 2010–2011. Main findings.). Reykjavík, Iceland: Directorate of Health; 2011.


3.
DTU Fødevareinstituttet. Danskernes kostvaner 2011–13 (dietary habits in Denmark). Söborg, Denmark: DTU Fødevareinstituttet; 2015.


4.
Holm Totland T, Kjerpeseth Melnæs B, Lundberg-Hallén N, Helland-Kigen K, Lund-Blix N, Borch Myhre J, et al. Norkost 3. En landsomfattende kostholdsundersøkelse blant menn og kvinner i Norge i alderen 18–70 år, 2010–11. (National dietary survey in men and women in Norway in ages 18–70 years, 2010–11). Oslo: Helsedirektoratet; 2012.


5.
Smith NW, Fletcher AJ, Hill JP, McNabb WC. Modeling the contribution of meat to global nutrient availability. Front Nutr 2022; 9: 766796. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.766796


6.
De Smet S, Vossen E. Meat: the balance between nutrition and health. A review. Meat Sci 2016; 120: 145–156. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.008


7.
Iglesias-Vázquez L, Arija V, Aranda N, Aglago EK, Cross AJ, Schulze MB, et al. Factors associated with serum ferritin levels and iron excess: results from the EPIC-EurGast study. Eur J Nutr 2022; 61: 101–114. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02625-w


8.
Bernardo P, Patarata L, Lorenzo JM, Fraqueza MJ. Nitrate is nitrate: the status Quo of using nitrate through vegetable extracts in meat products. Foods 2021; 10: 3019. doi: 10.3390/foods10123019


9.
Farvid MS, Sidahmed E, Spence ND, Mante Angua K, Rosner BA, Barnett JB. Consumption of red meat and processed meat and cancer incidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Eur J Epidemiol 2021; 36: 937–51. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00741-9


10.
Zhang R, Fu J, Moore JB, Stoner L, Li R. Processed and unprocessed red meat consumption and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18: 10788. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010788


11.
Vernooij RWM, Zeraatkar D, Han MA, El Dib R, Zworth M, Milio K, et al. Patterns of red and processed meat consumption and risk for cardiometabolic and cancer outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Cohort studies. Ann Intern Med 2019; 171: 732–41. doi: 10.7326/M19-1583


12.
Yang C, Pan L, Sun C, Xi Y, Wang L, Li D. Red meat consumption and the risk of stroke: a dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2016; 25: 1177–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2016.01.040


13.
Farchi S, De Sario M, Lapucci E, Davoli M, Michelozzi P. Meat consumption reduction in Italian regions: health co-benefits and decreases in GHG emissions. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0182960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182960


14.
González N, Marquès M, Nadal M, Domingo JL. Meat consumption: which are the current global risks? A review of recent (2010–2020) evidences. Food Res Int 2020; 137: 109341. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109341


15.
Lupoli R, Vitale M, Calabrese I, Giosuè A, Riccardi G, Vaccaro O. White meat consumption, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutrients 2021; 13: 676. doi: 10.3390/nu13020676


16.
Kim K, Hyeon J, Lee SA, Kwon SO, Lee H, Keum N, et al. Role of total, red, processed, and white meat consumption in stroke incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e005983. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005983


17.
Kim SR, Kim K, Lee SA, Kwon SO, Lee JK, Keum N, et al. Effect of red, processed, and white meat consumption on the risk of gastric cancer: An overall and dose-response meta-analysis. Nutrients 2019; 11: 826. doi: 10.3390/nu11040826


18.
Høyer A, Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – prioritisation of topics for de novo systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2021; 65: 7828. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v65.7828


19.
Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – structure and rationale of qualified systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2020; 64: 4403. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4403


20.
Arnesen EK, Christensen JJ, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – handbook for qualified systematic reviews. Food Nutr Res 2020; 64: 4404. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4404


21.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71


22.
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n160


23.
Christensen JJ, Arnesen EK, Andersen R, Eneroth H, Erkkola M, Høyer A, et al. The Nordic Nutrition Recommendations 2022 – principles and methodologies. Food Nutr Res 2020: 64; 4402. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v64.4402


24.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2019; 366: l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898


25.
Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review. Risk of bias for nutrition observational studies (RoB-NObs) tool. 2019. Available from: https://nesr.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2019-07/RiskOf-BiasForNutritionObservationalStudies-RoB-NObs.pdf [cited 11 May 2021].


26.
Risk of bias tools. Robvis. Available from: https://www.riskofbias.info/welcome/robvis-visualization-tool [cited 10 July 2022].


27.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014.


28.
Morton SC, Murad MH, O’Connor E, Lee CS, Booth M, Vandermeer BW, et al. Quantitative Synthesis—An Update. Methods Guide for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. (Prepared by the Scientific Resource Center under Contract No. 290-2012-0004-C). AHRQ Publication No. 18-EHC007- EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2018.


29.
Deeks JJ, Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Altman DG, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of Interventions, version 510: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: https://training.cochrane.org/handbook/current [cited 27 May 2021]


30.
Clinical Calculators. Odds Ratio to Risk Ratio. Available from: https://clincalc.com/stats/convertor.aspx [cited 24 June 2022].


31.
Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA 1998; 280: 1690–1. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.19.1690


32.
Bergeron N, Chiu S, Williams PT, M King S, Krauss RM. Effects of red meat, white meat, and nonmeat protein sources on atherogenic lipoprotein measures in the context of low compared with high saturated fat intake: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2019; 110: 24–33. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz035


33.
Mateo-Gallego R, Perez-Calahorra S, Cenarro A, Bea AM, Andres E, Horno J, et al. Effect of lean red meat from lamb v. lean white meat from chicken on the serum lipid profile: a randomised, cross-over study in women. Br J Nutr 2012; 107: 1403–7. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511004545


34.
Scott LW, Dunn JK, Pownall HJ, Brauchi DJ, McMann MC, Herd JA, et al. Effects of beef and chicken consumption on plasma lipid levels in hypercholesterolemic men. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 1261–7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420110109012


35.
Bernstein AM, Sun Q, Hu FB, Stampfer MJ, Manson JE, Willett WC. Major dietary protein sources and risk of coronary heart disease in women. Circulation 2010; 122: 876–83. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.915165


36.
Haring B, Gronroos N, Nettleton JA, von Ballmoos MC, Selvin E, Alonso A. Dietary protein intake and coronary heart disease in a large community based cohort: results from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study [corrected]. PLoS One 2014; 9(10): e109552. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109552


37.
Key TJ, Appleby PN, Bradbury KE, Sweeting M, Wood A, Johansson I, et al. Consumption of meat, fish, dairy products, and eggs and risk of ischemic heart disease. Circulation 2019; 139: 2835–45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038813


38.
Haring B, Misialek JR, Rebholz CM, Petruski-Ivleva N, Gottesman RF, Mosley TH, et al. Association of dietary protein consumption with incident silent cerebral infarcts and stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Stroke 2015; 46(12): 3443–50. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010693


39.
Farvid MS, Malekshah AF, Pourshams A, Poustchi H, Sepanlou SG, Sharafkhah M, et al. Dietary protein sources and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: The Golestan cohort study in Iran. Am J Prev Med 2017; 52: 237–48. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.041


40.
Nagao M, Iso H, Yamagishi K, Date C, Tamakoshi A. Meat consumption in relation to mortality from cardiovascular disease among Japanese men and women. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012; 66: 687–93. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.6


41.
Bernstein AM, Pan A, Rexrode KM, Stampfer M, Hu FB, Mozaffarian D, et al. Dietary protein sources and the risk of stroke in men and women. Stroke 2012; 43: 637–44. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.633404


42.
Sauvaget C, Nagano J, Allen N, Grant EJ, Beral V. Intake of animal products and stroke mortality in the Hiroshima/Nagasaki Life Span Study. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32: 536–43. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyg151


43.
Park K, Son J, Jang J, Kang R, Chung HK, Lee KW, et al. Unprocessed meat consumption and incident cardiovascular diseases in Korean adults: The Korean genome and epidemiology study (KoGES). Nutrients 2017; 9: 498. doi: 10.3390/nu9050498


44.
Kappeler R, Eichholzer M, Rohrmann S. Meat consumption and diet quality and mortality in NHANES III. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 598–606. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.59


45.
Lee JE, McLerran DF, Rolland B, Chen Y, Grant EJ, Vedanthan R, et al. Meat intake and cause-specific mortality: a pooled analysis of Asian prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2013; 98: 1032–41. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.062638


46.
Rohrmann S, Overvad K, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Jakobsen MU, Egeberg R, Tjønneland A, et al. Meat consumption and mortality – results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. BMC Med 2013; 11: 63. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-63


47.
Takata Y, Shu XO, Gao YT, Li H, Zhang X, Gao J, et al. Red meat and poultry intakes and risk of total and cause-specific mortality: results from cohort studies of Chinese adults in Shanghai. PLoS One 2013; 8: e56963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056963


48.
van den Brandt PA. Red meat, processed meat, and other dietary protein sources and risk of overall and cause-specific mortality in The Netherlands Cohort Study. Eur J Epidemiol 2019; 34: 351–69. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00483-9


49.
Du H, Guo Y, Bennett DA, Bragg F, Bian Z, Chadni M, et al. Red meat, poultry and fish consumption and risk of diabetes: a 9 year prospective cohort study of the China Kadoorie Biobank. Diabetologia 2020; 63: 767–79. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05091-x


50.
InterAct Consortium, Bendinelli B, Palli D, Masala G, Sharp SJ, Schulze MB, et al. Association between dietary meat consumption and incident type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetologia 2013; 56: 47–59. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2718-7


51.
Kurotani K, Nanri A, Goto A, Mizoue T, Noda M, Oba S, et al. Red meat consumption is associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes in men but not in women: a Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Br J Nutr 2013; 110: 1910–8. doi: 10.1017/S0007114513001128


52.
Männistö S, Kontto J, Kataja-Tuomola M, Albanes D, Virtamo J. High processed meat consumption is a risk factor of type 2 diabetes in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention study. Br J Nutr 2010; 103: 1817–22. doi: 10.1017/S0007114510000073


53.
Montonen J, Järvinen R, Heliövaara M, Reunanen A, Aromaa A, Knekt P. Food consumption and the incidence of type II diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Nutr 2005; 59: 441–8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602094


54.
Steinbrecher A, Erber E, Grandinetti A, Kolonel LN, Maskarinec G. Meat consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes: the Multiethnic Cohort. Public Health Nutr 2011; 14: 568–74. doi: 10.1017/S1368980010002004


55.
Talaei M, Wang YL, Yuan JM, Pan A, Koh WP. Meat, dietary heme iron, and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: tThe Singapore Chinese Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2017; 186: 824–33. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx156


56.
van Woudenbergh GJ, Kuijsten A, Tigcheler B, Sijbrands EJ, van Rooij FJ, Hofman A, et al. Meat consumption and its association with C-reactive protein and incident type 2 diabetes: the Rotterdam Study. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1499–505. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1899


57.
Villegas R, Shu XO, Gao YT, Yang G, Cai H, Li H, et al. The association of meat intake and the risk of type 2 diabetes may be modified by body weight. Int J Med Sci 2006; 3: 152–9. doi: 10.7150/ijms.3.152


58.
Denke MA. Role of beef and beef tallow, an enriched source of stearic acid, in a cholesterol-lowering diet. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60(6 Suppl): 1044S–9S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/60.6.1044S


59.
Morgan SA, Sinclair AJ, O’Dea K. Effect on serum lipids of addition of safflower oil or olive oil to very-low-fat diets rich in lean beef. J Am Diet Assoc 1993; 93: 644–8. doi: 10.1016/0002-8223(93)91669-H


60.
Beauchesne-Rondeau E, Gascon A, Bergeron J, Jacques H. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemic men fed a lipidlowering diet containing lean beef, lean fish, or poultry. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 587–93. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.3.587


61.
Melanson K, Gootman J, Myrdal A, Kline G, Rippe JM. Weight loss and total lipid profile changes in overweight women consuming beef or chicken as the primary protein source. Nutrition 2003; 19: 409–14. doi: 10.1016/S0899-9007(02)01080-8


62.
Kim K, Hyeon J, Lee SA, Kwon SO, Lee H, Keum N, et al. Role of total, red, processed, and white meat consumption in stroke incidence and mMortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6: e005983.


63.
Yang X, Li Y, Wang C, Mao Z, Zhou W, Zhang L, et al. Meat and fish intake and type 2 diabetes: dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Diabetes Metab 2020; 46: 345–52. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2020.03.004


64.
Guo N, Zhu Y, Tian D, Zhao Y, Zhang C, Mu C, et al. Role of diet in stroke incidence: an umbrella review of meta-analyses of prospective observational studies. BMC Med 2022; 20: 194. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02381-6


65.
Xie Y, Ma Y, Cai L, Jiang S, Li C. Reconsidering meat intake and human health: a review of current research. Mol Nutr Food Res 2022; 66: e2101066. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.202101066


66.
Pan A. Red meat consumption and mortality: results from two prospective cohort studies. Arch Int Med 2012; 172: 555–63. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.2287


67.
Ibsen DB, Warberg CK, Würtz AML, Overvad K, Dahm CC. Substitution of red meat with poultry or fish and risk of type 2 diabetes: a Danish cohort study. Eur J Nutr 2019; 58: 2705–12. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1820-0


68.
Ibsen DB, Steur M, Imamura F, Overvad K, Schulze MB, Bendinelli B, et al. Replacement of red and processed meat with other food sources of protein and the risk of type 2 diabetes in European populations: The EPIC-InterAct study. Diabetes Care 2020; 43: 2660–67. doi: 10.2337/dc20-1038


69.
Würtz AM, Hansen MD, Tjønneland A, Rimm EB, Schmidt EB, Overvad K, et al. Substitutions of red meat, poultry and fish and risk of myocardial infarction. Br J Nutr 2016; 115: 1571–8. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516000507


70.
Würtz AML, Jakobsen MU, Bertoia ML, Hou T, Schmidt EB, Willett WC, et al. Replacing the consumption of red meat with other major dietary protein sources and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr 2021; 113: 612–21. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa284
Published
2023-12-28
How to Cite
Ramel A., Nwaru B. I., Lamberg-Allardt C., Thorisdottir B., Bärebring L., Söderlund F., Arnesen E. K., Dierkes J., & Åkesson A. (2023). White meat consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Food & Nutrition Research, 67. https://doi.org/10.29219/fnr.v67.9543
Issue
Vol 67 (2023)
Section
Nordic Nutrition Recommendations
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright of their work, with first publication rights granted to SNF Swedish Nutrition Foundation. Read the full Copyright- and Licensing Statement.

 

 

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Most read articles by the same author(s)